A Comparison of Two Isoreticular Metal–Organic Frameworks with Cationic and Neutral Skeletons: Stability, Mechanism, and Catalytic Activity

Ge Huang,Li Yang,Qi Yin,Zhi-Bin Fang,Xiao-Jing Hu,An-An Zhang,Jun Jiang,Tian-Fu Liu,Rong Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201916649
2020-01-01
Angewandte Chemie
Abstract:AbstractAlthough many ionic metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been reported, little is known about how the charge of the skeleton affects the properties of the MOF materials. Herein we report how the chemical stability of MOFs can be substantially improved through embedding electrostatic interactions in structure. A MOF with a cationic skeleton is impervious to extremely acidic, oxidative, reductive, and high ionic strength conditions, such as 12 m HCl (301 days), aqua regia (86 days), H2O2 (30 days), and seawater (30 days), which is unprecedented for MOFs. DFT calculations suggested that steric hinderance and the repulsive interaction of the cationic framework toward positively charged species in microenvironments protects the vulnerable bonds in the structure. Diverse functionalities can be bestowed by substituting the counterions of the charged framework with identically charged functional species, which broadens the horizon in the design of MOFs adaptable to a demanding environment with specific functionalities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?