Systematic study of the chemical and hydrothermal stability of selected “stable” Metal Organic Frameworks

Karen Leus,Thomas Bogaerts,Jeroen De Decker,Hannes Depauw,Kevin Hendrickx,Henk Vrielinck,Veronique Van Speybroeck,Pascal Van Der Voort
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.11.055
IF: 5.876
2016-05-01
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
Abstract:In this work, the hydrothermal and chemical stability towards acids, bases, air, water, and peroxides of Metal Organic Frameworks, that are commonly considered to be stable, is presented. As a proof of stability both the crystallinity and porosity are measured before and after exposure to the stress test. The major part of the MOFs examined in this study show a good hydrothermal stability except for UiO-67, NH2-MIL-101 (Al) and CuBTC. The chemical stabilities towards acids and bases show a similar tendency and an ordering can be proposed as: MIL-101(Cr) > NH2-UiO-66 > UiO-66 > UiO-67 > NH2-MIL-53 > MIL-53(Al)>ZIF-8 > CuBTC > NH2-MIL-101(Al). In the tests with H2O2 most materials behaved poorly, only the UiO-66 and NH2-UiO-66 frameworks show a good stability.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,nanoscience & nanotechnology, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?