P450-BM3-Catalyzed Sulfoxidation Versus Hydroxylation: A Common or Two Different Catalytically Active Species?

Jian-bo Wang,Qun Huang,Wei Peng,Peng Wu,Da Yu,Bo Chen,Binju Wang,Manfred T. Reetz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13061
IF: 15
2020-01-01
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Abstract:While the mechanism of the P450-catalyzed oxidative hydroxylation of organic compounds has been studied in detail for many years, less is known about sulfoxidation. Depending upon the structure of the respective substrate, heme-Fe= O (Cpd I), heme-Fe(III)-OOH (Cpd 0), and heme-Fe(III)-H2O2 (protonated Cpd 0) have been proposed as reactive intermediates. In the present study, we consider the transformation of isosteric substrates via sulfoxidation and oxidative hydroxylation, respectively, catalyzed by regio- and enantioselective mutants of P450-BM3 which were constructed by directed evolution. 1-Thiochromanone and 1-tetralone were used as the isosteric substrates because, unlike previous studies involving fully flexible compounds such as thia-fatty acids and fatty acids, respectively, these compounds are rigid and cannot occur in a multitude of different conformations and binding modes in the large P450-BM3 binding pocket. The experimental results comprising activity and regio- and enantioselectivity, flanked by molecular dynamics computations within a time scale of 300 ns and QM/MM calculations of transition-state energies, unequivocally show that heme-Fe=O (Cpd I) is the common catalytically active intermediate in both sulfoxidation and oxidative hydroxylation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?