Abstract:Background Unlike left ventricular function, right ventricular (RV) function in pacemaker patients is less well studied with less studies comparing septal versus apical pacing effects on the RV function and almost none on the right atrial (RA) function. Purpose To assess the effect of RV pacing on the echocardiographic and clinical parameters of the RV and RA function and their correlation with the site of right ventricular lead implantation. Methods The study assessed 59 patients in need of permanent dual chamber pacemaker implantation using clinical and echocardiographic data of the RV and RA size and function using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), S wave velocity of the tricuspid annulus and fractional area change (FAC), free wall strain (FWSL), global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the RV, RA strain including reservoir, conduit and contraction phases and 3D ejection fraction of the RV using Epiq 7 Ultrasound machine (Philips Healthcare) by the same echocardiographer before implantation and 6 months after. All programming parameters were recorded postoperative and 6 months later. Results 31 patients had the RV lead in the RV apex whereas 28 had it in the septum and all patients had their RA lead in the right atrial appendage, with no significant difference between both groups regarding baseline demographic, clinical nor echocardiographic data. At 6 months, there was a significant decline of the 3D RVEF from a mean of (58.57% ± 6.35%) to (56.41% ± 6.17%), TAPSE from (2.61 cm ± 0.51) to (2.35 cm ± 0.52) and S wave from (13.73 cm/sec ± 2.84) to (12.64 cm/sec ± 2.61) but none showed a significant difference between septal and apical pacing, on the other hand, the RV strain showed a significant decline 6 months after implantation in both the FWSL from (-31.75% ± 5.39) to (-27.82% ± 5.73) and the GLS from (-25.89% ± 5.17) to (-21.65% ± 4.51) with more decline in the septal group compared to the apical (-20.33% ± 4.70 versus -22.84% ± 4.04 regarding the GLS and -26.11% ± 6.41 versus -29.37% ± 4.62 in the FWSL, respectively). There was no difference in the FAC, tricuspid regurgitation severity, gradient nor the estimated pulmonary artery pressure at 6 months. The RA size showed a significant decline at 6 months but no difference in any of the strain parameters. No clinical RV failure symptoms nor signs were observed. Programming revealed a mean percentage of ventricular pacing of (97.92% ± 2.67%) with a minimum of 91% and atrial pacing of (10.41% ± 12.52%), and the thresholds, impedance and atrial high-rate episodes were comparable postoperatively and 6 months after, with no difference between the septal and apical groups. Conclusion At 6 months follow-up after pacemaker implantation, right ventricular function starts to show decline in both the septal and apical groups with only the right ventricular strain more affected in the septal group compared to the apical.3D right ventricular ejection fraction3D right ventricular strain

Evaluating the left ventricular hemodynamic phenomena of DDD septum pacemaker implants using vector flow mapping

The Assessment of Diastolic Blood Flow Field Related Energy Loss of Left Ventricle in Patients with Right Heart Dual-Chamber Pacing Using Ultrasonic Vector Flow Mapping

Speckle tracking imaging evaluation of left ventricular myocardial work comparing right ventricular septal pacing with His-Purkinje system area pacing

Effects of different strategies to minimize ventricular pacing on cardiac function in heart failure patients

A New Integrated Approach to Improve Left Ventricular Electromechanical Activation During Right Ventricular Septal Pacing

Study of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with DDD Pacemaker Implantation During Atrioventricular Conduction and Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Mode

Assessment of Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with DDD Pacing by Velocity Vector Imaging

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular global and segmental myocardial systolic function with pacing at variant right ventricular sites

[Long-Term Effect of Different Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Ratio on Heart Structure and Function of Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemaker].

Effects of right atrial and ventricular DDD pacing on cardiac function and ventricular contraction synchrony

Influence of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular vortices with vector flow mapping

Evaluation on Left Ventricular Intra-Cardiac Flow Field Before and after Temporary Interruption of Pacemaker in Mid-to-long-term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients by Vector Flow Mapping

Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy using vector flow mapping

Optimization of Left Ventricle Pace Maker Location Using Echo-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Models

Assessment of left ventricular systolic synchrony in patients with DDD pacing by velocity vector imaging

Evaluation of differences in left ve ntricular myocardial mechanical patterns between right ventricular pacing sites and atr oiventricular sequential pa cing using ultrasonic tissue tracking imaging

Hemodynamic Study of Pacing at the Right Ventricular Inlet Septum

Effects of pacing on hemodynamics in right ventricular outflow tract

Vector flow mapping for assessing Beagle dogs′ left ventricular vortex in selective bi-polar single site cardiac pacing

Study of right atrial and right ventricular function in dual chamber pacemaker patients