Abstract:Background and objective: Aortic blood pressure (ABP) is a more effective prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease than peripheral blood pressure. A highly accurate algorithm for non-invasively deriving the ABP wave, based on ultrasonic measurement of aortic flow combined with peripheral pulse wave measurements, has been proposed elsewhere. However, it has remained at the proof-of-concept stage because it requires a priori knowledge of the ABP waveform to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). The objective of this study is to transform this proof-of-concept algorithm into a clinically feasible technique. Methods: We used the Bramwell-Hill equation to non-invasively calculate aortic PWV which was then used to reconstruct the ABP waveform from non-invasively determined aortic blood flow velocity, aortic diameter, and radial pressure. The two aortic variables were acquired by an ultrasound system from 90 subjects, followed by recordings of radial pressure using a SphygmoCor device. The ABPs estimated by the new algorithm were compared with reference values obtained by cardiac catheterization (invasive validation, 8 subjects aged 62.3 ± 12.7 years) and a SphygmoCor device (non-invasive validation, 82 subjects aged 45.0 ± 17.8 years). Results: In the invasive comparison, there was good agreement between the estimated and directly measured pressures: the mean error in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 1.4 ± 0.8 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 0.9 ± 0.8 mmHg; mean blood pressure (MBP), 1.8 ± 1.2 mmHg and pulse pressure (PP), 1.4 ± 1.1 mmHg. In the non-invasive comparison, the estimated and directly measured pressures also agreed well: the errors being: SBP, 2.0 ± 1.4 mmHg; DBP, 0.8 ± 0.1 mmHg; MBP, 0.1 ± 0.1 mmHg and PP, 2.3 ± 1.6 mmHg. The significance of the differences in mean errors between calculated and reference values for SBP, DBP, MBP and PP were assessed by paired t-tests. The agreement between the reference methods and those obtained by applying the new approach was also expressed by correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion: The new method proposed here can accurately estimate ABP, allowing this important variable to be obtained non-invasively, using standard, well validated measurement techniques. It thus has the potential to relocate ABP estimation from a research environment to more routine use in the cardiac clinic. Short abstract: A highly accurate algorithm for non-invasively deriving the ABP wave has been proposed elsewhere. However, it has remained at the proof-of-concept stage because it requires a priori knowledge of the ABP waveform to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). This study aims to transform this proof-of-concept algorithm into a clinically feasible technique. We used the Bramwell-Hill equation to non-invasively calculate aortic PWV which was then used to reconstruct the ABP waveform. The ABPs estimated by the new algorithm were compared with reference values obtained by cardiac catheterization or a SphygmoCor device. The results showed that there was good agreement between the estimated and directly measured pressures. The new method proposed can accurately estimate ABP, allowing this important variable to be obtained non-invasively, using standard, well validated measurement techniques. It thus has the potential to relocate ABP estimation from a research environment to more routine use in the cardiac clinic.

Abstract 122: Reliability Analysis for Image-based Non-invasive Pressure Quantification in Aortorenal Artery Systems

Validation of Hemodynamic Stress Calculation in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound

On Intlet Pressure Boundary Conditions for CT-Based Computation of FFRSS: Clinical Measurement of Aortic Pressure

Challenges in Multislice Computed Tomography Based Fractional Flow Reserve to Evaluate Interventional Treatment

Fast and Noninvasive Evaluation of in Vivo Pressure in Stenosed Aortoiliac Arteries

Uncertainty quantification of the pressure waveform using a Windkessel model

On inlet pressure boundary conditions for CT-based computation of fractional flow reserve: clinical measurement of aortic pressure

Noninvasive Assessment of Cerebral Artery Stenoses from Anatomic Computed Tomography Angiography

Non-invasive estimation of the parameters of a three-element windkessel model of aortic arch arteries in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Image-based assessment of fractional flow reserve.

A new noninvasive and patient-specific hemodynamic index for the severity of renal stenosis and outcome of interventional treatment

Computational Analysis of Hemodynamic Indices Based on Personalized Identification of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity by a Neural Network

Inlet and Outlet Boundary Conditions and Uncertainty Quantification in Volumetric Lattice Boltzmann Method for Image-Based Computational Hemodynamics

Uncertainty quantification of inflow boundary condition and proximal arterial stiffness coupled effect on pulse wave propagation in a vascular network

Geometric Uncertainty of Patient-Specific Blood Vessels and its Impact on Aortic Hemodynamics

Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Flow–pressure Relation in Multiple Sequential Stenoses Coronary Artery

Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of the aortic blood pressure waveform by ultrasound and tonometry

A Novel Method of Noninvasive Quantification of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

Calculation of coronary artery non-invasive blood flow reserve fraction based on combination of digital and analog

Numerical Simulation in the Abdominal Aorta and the Visceral Arteries with or Without Stenosis Based on 2D PCMRI

Accuracy and temporal analysis of non-Newtonian models of blood in the computational FFR – Numerical implementation