Abstract:Whereas fractional flow reserve has been a “gold standard” to determine the severity of coronary stenosis, the trans-stenotic pressure gradient (TSPG) might be an alternative to assess the severity of iliac arterial stenoses. Because it is determined by the proximal (Pa) and distal (Pd) pressure to a stenosis, we developed a novel method to evaluate the four-dimensional (space and time) in vivo blood flow (pressure, velocity, and wall shear stress) in stenosed aortoiliac arteries based on computed tomography angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Such a means not only can quantify in vivo blood pressure noninvasively but also enable massive studies to determine whether TSPG can assess the true severity of iliac stenosis. We employ a patented in-house computational platform, InVascular, to quantify the four-dimensional (space and time) hemodynamics (velocity and pressure) in a stenosed iliac artery. Clinically acquired computed tomography angiography images are used to anatomically extract the three-dimensional flow domain, and the flow information is obtained from the velocity waveforms of Doppler ultrasound. Through the integration of advanced computational modeling and cutting-edge parallel computing technique, InVascular can quickly compute the proximal (Pa) and distal (Pd) pressure to a stenosis, schematized in Fig, a. Thus, TSPG (= Pa − Pd) is obtained. Three cases with five iliac stenoses are studied, in each of which Pa and Pd are measured during angiography. Fig, b compares the cardiac pressure waveforms of Pa (top) and Pd (bottom) between noninvasive computation (line) and invasive measurement (symbols), respectively. The good agreements indicate the accuracy of InVascular. Statistical analysis for the correlation between computed and measured pressures (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial values) is shown in the Table. Both paired sample t-test (P > .05) and Pearson correlation (P < .05) reveal the significant correlation between computed and measured pressures. InVascular is a new and reliable means for noninvasive evaluation of in vivo pressure in stenosed aortoiliac arteries, from which TSPG can be obtained. With the outstanding feature of fast computation, InVascular will have an impact on the development of a new noninvasive gold standard to determine the true severity of iliac stenosis.TableStatisticsVariableMean pressure difference measured vs calculatedStandard deviationt valueP valueCorrelation coefficientP valuePressure systolic5.107.362.19.060.973.00E-6Pressure diastolic3.908.391.47.180.66.04Mean arterial pressure4.306.482.10.070.921.75E-4 Open table in a new tab

Non-invasive Estimation of Pressure Drop Across Aortic Coarctations: Validation of 0D and 3D Computational Models with In Vivo Measurements

Experiments and Simulations to Assess Exercise-Induced Pressure Drop Across Aortic Coarctations

CTA-Based Non-invasive Estimation of Pressure Gradients Across a CoA: a Validation Against Cardiac Catheterisation

Validation and Diagnostic Performance of a CFD-Based Non-invasive Method for the Diagnosis of Aortic Coarctation.

Deep learning based assessment of hemodynamics in the coarctation of the aorta: comparison of bidirectional recurrent and convolutional neural networks

A Novel Diastolic Doppler Index Less Affected by Aortic Arch Anomalies Co-existing with Coarctation

Non-invasive estimation of the parameters of a three-element windkessel model of aortic arch arteries in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Study on hemodynamics in patient-specific thoracic aortic coarctation model

Coronary Obstruction Analysis in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Through Patient-Specific Computational Modelling

Assessment of hemodynamic responses to exercise in aortic coarctation using MRI-ergometry in combination with computational fluid dynamics

Numerical Validation of A Suprasystolic Brachial Cuff-Based Method for Estimating Aortic Pressure

Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter

Impact of Turbulence Modeling on the Simulation of Blood Flow in Aortic Coarctation

In silico modeling for personalized stenting in aortic coarctation

In silico data-based comparison of the accuracy and error source of various methods for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure

Enhanced 4D Flow MRI-Based CFD with Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Flow Dynamics Assessment in Coarctation of the Aorta

Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis

Clinical validation and assessment of aortic hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics simulations from computed tomography angiography

Fast and Noninvasive Evaluation of in Vivo Pressure in Stenosed Aortoiliac Arteries

The effect of coarctation degrees on wall shear stress indices

Multiscale Study on Hemodynamics in Patient-Specific Thoracic Aortic Coarctation.