The effects of MWCNT-STF on the impact resistance of fibre metal laminates

Junlin Yu,Xiaolian Wang,Jianfei Li,Debiao Luo,Mengcheng Li,Ruixuan Li,Zhongping He,Jiangfeng Dong,Qingyuan Wang,Zhongwei Guan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.112516
IF: 5.881
2024-10-09
Thin-Walled Structures
Abstract:Fibre metal laminates (FMLs) have been widely used in the aerospace and transportation industries, due to their excellent impact and fatigue resistance. However, it is challenging to further improve the impact resistance of FMLs. In this study, shear thickening fluids (STFs) with different ratios of silicon nanoparticles to polyethylene glycol (PEG) were first produced to obtain the STF with optimized performance. Then, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were added to the STF to produce MWCNT-STF to further improve its shear thickening behaviour. The rheological test results have shown that the MWCNT-STF with the composition ratio of 30 wt% PEG200+0.2 wt% MWCNTs+69.8 wt% SiO 2 demonstrates the best shear thickening function, with the peak viscosity being enhanced by 365 % but the critical shear rate reduced by 69 % compared with the original STF. The MWCNT-STF was then impregnated to Kevlar fabric by ultrasonic impregnation process. The experimental results show that MWCNTs contribute the best adhesion to Kevlar fabric when the ratio of MWCNT-STF to alcohol is 1:2, with the optimal add-on ratio as 53 %. The yarn pulling-out tests show that the addition of MWCNTs to STF improves the friction between the fabric yarns, which in turn increases their shear resistance. Then STF and MWCNT-STF Kevlar fabrics were integrated to FML manufacturing. The quasi-static perforation tests indicate that MWCNT-STF helps improve the specific energy absorption of the MWCNT-STF FMLs by up to 16 %, but with limited impact on the peak perforation force. More effectively, the low velocity impact tests show that the 3/2 FMLs made with 1, 2, and 3 layers of MWCNT-STF Kevlar fabric have an enhancement on their peak impact force by 20, 36 and 38 %, while on specific energy absorption by 30, 40 and 42 %, respectively, compared to 3/2 STF FMLs counterparts.
engineering, mechanical,mechanics, civil
What problem does this paper attempt to address?