Abstract:The escalating usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms across diverse fields has prompted apprehension regarding the propagation of algorithmic bias, which may exacerbate instances of discrimination and inequality. Algorithmic bias in AI and machine learning (ML) techniques manifests in real-world applications as a result of either insufficient data variation or augmentation availability in the AI/ML training data, or a flawed learning policy. This leads to the accidental propagation of AI bias as an unjust treatment of particular groups of individuals, owing to their race, gender [1], age, or other distinguishing attributes in practical applications. This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of algorithmic bias, encompassing its origins, ethical and social ramifications, and possible remediations. In addition, this paper introduces an innovative methodology for identifying and measuring algorithmic bias that integrates statistical analysis with input from users and domain specialists. This exposition examines distinct forms of algorithmic biases, such as selection bias, confirmation bias, and measurement bias, and examines underlying catalysts for algorithmic bias, encompassing data integrity concerns, decisions regarding algorithmic design, and institutional prejudgments. The adverse ramifications of algorithmic bias, including the perpetuation of social inequality and the impeding of societal advancement, are the focus of our examination. The present study seeks to make a contribution to the advancement of impartial [2] and equitable AI systems with the potential to foster societal progress and benefit individuals across diverse demographics by identifying the sources and repercussions of algorithmic bias and recommending efficacious interventions.

"End to End" Towards a Framework for Reducing Biases and Promoting Transparency of Algorithmic Systems

Towards Algorithmic Transparency: A Diversity Perspective.

Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems - A Fish-Eye View

Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions

Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective

"It would be pretty immoral to choose a random algorithm"

Algorithmic bias: Looking beyond data bias to ensure algorithmic accountability and equity

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

AI Algorithmic Bias: Understanding its Causes, Ethical and Social Implications

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Fair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future Challenges

Algorithmic Bias and Risk Assessments: Lessons from Practice

Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms

Designing Equitable Algorithms

Fairway: SE Principles for Building Fairer Software

Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness

Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias

The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us

Fairness via AI: Bias Reduction in Medical Information

Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing

Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice