The Uterine Micro-Peristalsis Phenomenon Relating to Clinical Outcome of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Yunfei Long,Rong Liang,Jiabin Zhang,Fang,Cheng,Qun Lu,Jue Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1025
IF: 6.7
2019-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:Uterine peristalsis has been reported to influence pregnancy chances in both natural and artificial cycles, but it is not convenient to observe clinically. Moreover, there is no tool for evaluating endometrial receptivity by invisible peristalsis of the uterus. We aim to identify the existence of a new phenomenon which is defined as uterine micro-peristalsis (UMP) by ultrasound video features, and to investigate the association between UMP and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). A prospective research study. Fifty-One infertility women were recruited, including 22 non-pregnant and 29 pregnant women. Transvaginal ultrasound videos, demographic characteristics and clinical pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET were collected. First of all, invisible UMP was magnified by video magnification[1]. Then the UMP was characterization by a new index named histogram entropy of peristalsis (HEP), which was the result of the video processing consisted of frame difference method and volume local phase quantization[2]. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the effect of HEP and other independent variables relating to clinical pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET. Besides, a comparison test of HEP between pregnant and non-pregnant patients was conducted. There was visible UMP in the video after video magnification, which was invisible with naked eyes in the original ultrasound video. The logistic regression result reveals that HEP (p<0.01) and luteinizing hormone (p<0.05) have significant effects on the clinical pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET, while other independent variables are not significantly associated with the clinical pregnancy outcome. Further, there exists a significant difference (p<0.01) in HEP between pregnant patients and non-pregnant patients after video magnification. The existence of uterine micro-peristalsis is identified by the proposed micro-motion magnification and characterization strategy. As a promising phenomenon, uterine micro-peristalsis provides a new insight for evaluating the endometrial receptivity of IVF-ET patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?