Abstract:Purpose: To construct and validate a nomogram model for predicting clinical pregnancy in individuals with endometriosis undergoing fersh embryo transfer (ET). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1630 individuals with endometriosis who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) with fresh embryo transfer at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 2018 to January 2022. The research population was sorted into two groups through random sampling, namely, the model group (n = 1141) and the validation group (n = 489), with a ratio of 7:3. Univariate analysis was utilized to determine the influencing factors for clinical pregnancy in the model group. The LASSO algorithm was utilized to select the optimal matching factors, which were then included in a multifactorial forward stepwise logistic regression to determine independent influencing factors and develop a nomogram. The discrimination, accuracy, and clinical efficacy of the prediction model were analyzed utilizing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve. Results: Through multivariate-logistic-regression analysis, these factors were identified as independent influencing factors for the clinical pregnancy in endometriosis patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer: female age (OR = 0.933, 95% CI = 0.902-0.965, P < 0.001), ASRM stage (OR = 0.384, 95% CI = 0.276-0.532, P < 0.001), postoperative to IVF duration (OR = 0.496, 95% CI = 0.356-0.688, P < 0.001), antral follicle count (AFC) (OR = 1.076, 95% CI = 1.013-1.161, P = 0.045), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) (OR = 1.202, 95% CI = 1.073-1.35, P = 0.002), Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol (OR = 1.536, 95% CI = 1.109-2.131, P = 0.01), number of oocytes retrieved (OR = 1.154, 95% CI = 1.067-1.249, P < 0.001), number of high-quality cleavage embryos (OR = 1.261, 95% CI = 1.164-1.369, P < 0.001), and number of embryos transferred (OR = 1.957, 95% CI = 1.435-2.679, P < 0.001). A prediction model for estimating the clinical pregnancy probability in individuals with endometriosis was constructed per these identified independent factors. The ROC showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.807 (95% CI = 0.782-0.832) in the model group and 0.800 (95% CI = 0.761-0.84) in the validation group. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test demonstrated no statistically significant difference between predicted and actual clinical pregnancy probabilities (P > 0.05). The clinical decision curve demonstrated that both the model and the validation groups achieved maximum net benefit at threshold probability values of 0.08-0.96 and 0.16-0.96, indicating good clinical efficacy within this range of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: Female age, ASRM stage, postoperative to IVF duration, stimulation protocol, AFC, AMH, number of oocytes retrieved, number of high-quality cleavage embryos and number of transferred embryos are independent influencing factors for the clinical pregnancy rate in individuals with endometriosis receiving fresh embryo transfer. The nomogram model based on these factors demonstrates good clinical predictive value and efficacy, providing a basis for clinical prognosis, intervention, and individualized medical treatment planning.

Evaluation of endometrial receptivity by ultrasound elastography to predict pregnancy outcome is a non-invasive and worthwhile method

An endometrial receptivity scoring system evaluated by ultrasonography in patients undergoing frozen–thawed embryo transfer: a prospective cohort study

An Endometrial Receptivity Scoring System Basing on the Endometrial Thickness, Volume, Echo, Peristalsis, and Blood Flow Evaluated by Ultrasonography.

An Ultrasound-Based Deep Learning Radiomic Model Combined with Clinical Data to Predict Clinical Pregnancy after Frozen Embryo Transfer: a Pilot Cohort Study.

Non-invasive Assessment of Endometrial Receptivity

An ultrasound-based deep learning radiomic model combined with clinical data to predict the success of frozen embryo transfer: a pilot cohort study

Using 2D/3D ultrasound observation of endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and blood flow changes to predict the outcome of frozen embryo transfer cycles: a prospective study

Preliminary application of real-time shear wave elastography to evaluate endometrial receptivity and predict pregnancy outcome

Can Biomarkers Identified from the Uterine Fluid Transcriptome Be Used to Establish a Noninvasive Endometrial Receptivity Prediction Tool? A Proof-of-concept Study

Endometrial Elasticity is an Ultrasound Marker for Predicting Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes after Embryo Transfer

Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting clinical pregnancy in endometriosis patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer

Role of Endometrial Blood Flow Assessment with Color Doppler Energy in Predicting Pregnancy Outcome of FET Cycles

Uterine fluid transcriptome as potential non-invasive biomarker for predicting endometrial receptivity

Analysis of the guidance value of 3D ultrasound in evaluating endometrial receptivity for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure

A Model for Pregnancy Rates after IVF-ET in Patients with Infertility and Endometriosis

Endometrial receptivity change: ultrasound evaluation on ovulation day and transplantation day during the natural frozen embryo transfer cycle

Enhancing endometrial receptivity in FET cycles: exploring the influence of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow along with endometrial volume

Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility

Multifactor Prediction of Embryo Transfer Outcomes Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm

Endometrial Thickness and Volume in the Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome after in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Comparison of Uterine Receptivity Between Fertile and Unexplained Infertile Women by Assessment of Endometrial and Subendometrial Perfusion Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Which Index is Better--Peak Intensity or Area under the Curve?