Study on CO migration characteristics after blasting in tunnel under different ventilation methods
Jinmiao Wang,Fangming Fan,Yan Xue,Jun Xiao,Zhuli Ren,Xiaoqiang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2024.2424918
2024-11-20
Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects
Abstract:Tunneling and blasting generate blasting smoke, containing high concentrations of toxic gases like CO and NOx, and dust. Prolonged CO presence in tunnels can harm workers. CO discharge in tunnels is influenced by ventilation methods and parameters. However, limited research exists on how ventilation parameters like the distance between the duct opening and the tunnel excavating face and the pressure extraction ratio affect CO levels. This paper uses Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to simulate and analyze these parameters' impact on CO migration after blasting in excavation roadways. Results show that under forced ventilation, CO migration speed is inversely proportional to the distance from the duct opening to the tunnel excavating face, with the best removal effect at 3 meters, reducing CO to a safe level in 170–180 seconds. Under exhaust ventilation, the closer the duct opening to the tunnel excavating face, the faster the CO migration, with the best removal effect at 1 meter, reducing CO to a safe level in 100–110 seconds. In mixed ventilation, different pressure extraction ratios significantly affect CO migration. With a constant press-in air volume, a pressure extraction ratio of 0.8 most effectively promotes CO migration, reducing CO to a safe level in 120–130 seconds.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical