Abstract:Electrochemical energy storage at a large scale poses one of the main technological challenges of this century. The scientific community in academia and industry worldwide intensively is exploring various alternative rechargeable battery concepts beside state‐of‐the‐art lithium ion batteries (LIBs), for example, all‐solid‐state batteries, lithium/sulfur batteries, magnesium/sulfur batteries or dual‐ion batteries that could outperform LIBs in different aspects. Often, these concepts also promise very high theoretical energies per mass or volume. However, as theoretical values exclude numerous relevant parameters, they do not translate directly into practically achievable energy values: The gaps between practical capacities and voltages compared to the theoretical values differ for each system. In order to provide high transparency and to illustrate which cell components are most important in the limitation of the practical energy values, in this study, the specific energies and energy densities are calculated in six subsequent steps—from the theoretical energy values of the active materials alone to the practical energy values in an 18650 cylindrical cell. By providing a tool to calculate the energy values of six different battery technologies with different assumptions made evident, this study aims for more transparency and reliability in the comparison of different cell chemistries. The practical energy content of different alternative cell chemistries (all‐solid‐state batteries, different types of lithium/sulfur batteries, magnesium/sulfur batteries, dual‐ion batteries) in comparison to lithium ion batteries is estimated in six calculation steps, from the theoretical energy content at material level to the practical energy at cell level. Special emphasis is placed on the necessary amount of electrolyte.

True performance metrics in beyond-intercalation batteries

True Performance Metrics in Electrochemical Energy Storage

Bridging the academic and industrial metrics for next-generation practical batteries

High-Energy Batteries: Beyond Lithium-Ion and Their Long Road to Commercialisation

Towards establishing standard performance metrics for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond

Non-destructive characterization techniques for battery performance and lifecycle assessment

'Beyond Li-ion technology'-a status review

Theoretical versus Practical Energy: A Plea for More Transparency in the Energy Calculation of Different Rechargeable Battery Systems

A Wide Range of Testing Results on an Excellent Lithium-Ion Cell Chemistry to be used as Benchmarks for New Battery Technologies

Theoretical Performance Comparison of Lithium Batteries

Investigation of the Performance of Different Battery Technologies for Electronic Devices

From Active Materials to Battery Cells: A Straightforward Tool to Determine Performance Metrics and Support Developments at an Application‐Relevant Level

Inherent Behavior of Electrode Materials of Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Advanced battery management systems: An in-depth comparative study

High performance Li-ion sulfur batteries enabled by intercalation chemistry

Establishment of performance metrics for batteries in large‐scale energy storage systems from perspective of technique, economics, environment and safety

Evaluation On Performance Of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based On Internal Physical And Chemical Parameters

Assessing cathode–electrolyte interphases in batteries

State-of-the-art Characterization Techniques for Advanced Lithium-Ion Batteries

Operando Methods and Probes for Battery Electrodes and Materials

Accelerating Measurement Times by Correlating Electrode/Electrolyte Interface Properties with Cycle and Calendar Lifetimes