Abstract:Maximizing is a topic that has received significant attention from researchers and corporate organizations alike. Although extensive previous research has explored how maximizers behave in a decision scenario, a fundamental question remains about why they prefer a larger assortment regardless of whether the decisions are important or not. This study attempts to explore the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon. Four surveys were conducted, and participants from Mturk or Credamo online platforms were recruited (N = 922). The maximizing tendency was measured by either maximization scale or maximizing tendency scale, and perceived importance and preference for a large assortment were measured in different decision scenarios. Across four studies, we find that maximizers perceive the same decision as more important than satisficers (Study 1), and perceived importance serves as the mechanism underlying the maximizers' preference for a large assortment (Study 2). In other words, in maximizers' perceptions and interpretations, even seemingly trivial decisions are important enough to spend great effort on a large assortment. We additionally identified a boundary condition for the effect - cost salience (Studies 3a and 3b). These findings illustrate a pioneering empirical exploration of the difference in the way maximizers and satisficers perceive their decision importance and the reason for maximizers' preference for a large assortment.

Do maximizers maximize in private? The influence of public versus private context on maximizing

Do maximizers maximize for others? Self-other decision-making differences in maximizing and satisficing

Taking Decisions Too Seriously: Why Maximizers Often Get Mired in Choices

Do Maximizing Consumers Engage More in Conspicuous Consumption?

A Study on Maximization Paradox and Its Psychological Origin

The Maximizing Penalty: Maximizers are Perceived as Less Warm and Receive Less Social Support

Which One Is Better,Maximizing or Satisficing?

Maximizing Without Borders: Evidence That Maximizing Transcends Decision Domains

Maximization Paradox: Result of Believing in an Objective Best

The Maximizing Mind-Set

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Maximize when Valuable: the Domain Specificity of Maximizing Decision-Making Style

Taking Risks for the Best: Maximizing and Risk-Taking Tendencies

More Accurate or Less Accurate: How Does Maximization Orientation Affect Task Completion Predictions?

When Seeking the Best Brings out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship Between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior

The Positive Side of Maximization: Linking Maximization Tendency with Meaning in Life Through Time Perspectives.

Maxims nudge equitable or efficient choices in a Trade-Off Game

Learning to Maximize (Expected) Utility

A New Look at the Impact of Maximizing on Unhappiness: Two Competing Mediating Effects.

How Maximizers Estimate Their Decision Time: the Mediating Effect of Memory Reduction

Maximizing tendency predicts university adjustment and academic performance