Abstract:Previous research shows that being in a situation of economic scarcity promotes a more concrete mindset that motivates behavioral decisions based on action difficulty and their short‐term outcomes, which frequently entails negative consequences. However, a concrete mindset can be counteracted by inducing an abstract mindset to help people focus on final broad goals. We explored how focusing on transcendent motives (vs. self‐oriented) promotes a more abstract mindset facilitating prosocial behavioral intentions. Study 1 (pre‐post design) explored whether focusing on transcendent motives for engaging in activities promoted a more abstract mindset compared to focusing on self‐oriented motives. Using a 2 × 2 design with two consecutive opposing primes, Study 2 tested how inducing a transcendent orientation could reverse the effect caused by perceiving economic scarcity, promoting greater orientation toward others and prosocial behavioral intentions. In Study 1 participants who generated transcendent motives for behaviors presented a greater increase in the abstraction of construal level, compared to those who only generated self‐oriented motives for the same behaviors. Study 2 demonstrated that, when participants who perceived economic scarcity were focused on transcendent motives (vs. self‐oriented) to promote a more abstract mindset, their orientation toward others increased. Interestingly, for people perceiving economic scarcity, whose own difficulties could reduce prosocial behaviors, the greater orientation toward others promoted a greater intention to engage in demanding prosocial behaviors. We provide evidence of new strategies to promote abstraction in individuals and increase their involvement in prosocial behavioral intentions, especially for those perceiving economic scarcity.

When Seeking the Best Brings out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship Between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior

The Maximizing Mind-Set

The pursuit of optimal distinctiveness and consumer preferences.

The More Envious the Consumer, the More Impulsive? the Moderating Role of Self-Monitoring and Product Type

How Time Horizon Perceptions and Relationship Deficits Affect Impulsive Consumption

The Maximizing Penalty: Maximizers are Perceived as Less Warm and Receive Less Social Support

Do Maximizing Consumers Engage More in Conspicuous Consumption?

Taking Decisions Too Seriously: Why Maximizers Often Get Mired in Choices

Maximization Paradox: Result of Believing in an Objective Best

Asserting Your Mind: Interruptions Extremize Consumer Choices

Charitable Maximizers: The Impact of the Maximizing Mindset on Donations to Human Recipients

Personal Motives, Moral Disengagement, and Unethical Decisions by Entrepreneurs: Cognitive Mechanisms on the “slippery Slope”

Influences of mental accounting on consumption decisions: asymmetric effect of a scarcity mindset

Breaking self‐focused orientation in people who perceive economic scarcity: The influence of transcendent motivation to promote an abstract mindset and prosocial behavioral intentions

Do maximizers maximize in private? The influence of public versus private context on maximizing

The Influence of Mindset Abstraction on Preference for Mixed Versus Extreme Approaches to Multigoal Pursuits

Do maximizers maximize for others? Self-other decision-making differences in maximizing and satisficing

Do Green Products Make Us Better People?

The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: patterns of reinforcement and utility maximization

Which One Is Better,Maximizing or Satisficing?

Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning?