Abstract:The random utility maximization model is by far the most adopted framework to estimate consumer choice behavior. However, behavioral economics has provided strong empirical evidence of irrational choice behaviors, such as halo effects, that are incompatible with this framework. Models belonging to the random utility maximization family may therefore not accurately capture such irrational behavior. Hence, more general choice models, overcoming such limitations, have been proposed. However, the flexibility of such models comes at the price of increased risk of overfitting. As such, estimating such models remains a challenge. In this work, we propose an estimation method for the recently proposed generalized stochastic preference choice model, which subsumes the family of random utility maximization models and is capable of capturing halo effects. In particular, we propose a column-generation method to gradually refine the discrete choice model based on partially ranked preference sequences. Extensive computational experiments indicate that our model, explicitly accounting for irrational preferences, can significantly boost the predictive accuracy on both synthetic and real-world data instances. Summary of Contribution: In this work, we propose an estimation method for the recently proposed generalized stochastic preference choice model, which subsumes the family of random utility maximization models and is capable of capturing halo effects. Specifically, we show how to use partially ranked preferences to efficiently model rational and irrational customer types from transaction data. Our estimation procedure is based on column generation, where relevant customer types are efficiently extracted by expanding a treelike data structure containing the customer behaviors. Furthermore, we propose a new dominance rule among customer types whose effect is to prioritize low orders of interactions among products. An extensive set of experiments assesses the predictive accuracy of the proposed approach by comparing it against rank-based methods with only rational preferences and with more general benchmarks from the literature. Our results show that accounting for irrational preferences can boost predictive accuracy by 12.5% on average when tested on a real-world data set from a large chain of grocery and drug stores.

The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: patterns of reinforcement and utility maximization

Modeling Inertia and Variety Seeking Tendencies in Brand Choice Behavior

Development of Choice Model for Brand Evaluation

Learning to Maximize (Expected) Utility

Theoretical Behaviorism, Economic Theory, and Choice

Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values

Testing a theory of strategic multi-product choice

Consumer behavior analysis and the marketing firm: measures of performance

Accounting for consumer choice: Inter-temporal decision making in behavioural perspective

Semiparametric Estimation of Brand Choice Behavior

On the robustness of the brand positivity effect: Is impulsivity a moderator of overly favorable judgments and choices of focal options?

Consumers' characteristics and brand choice behaviour: Loyalty and consumption

Do Americans seek pleasure while Chinese care about others’ approval? Examining stereotypical utilities positioning in brand choice contexts

Best Value, Price-Seeking, and Price Aversion: The Impact of Information and Learning on Consumer Choices

Asserting Your Mind: Interruptions Extremize Consumer Choices

When Seeking the Best Brings out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship Between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior

The choice between uniqueness and conformity in mass customization

Social Networks and the Choices People Make

On the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models to Capture Irrational Customer Behaviors

Counterfactual Inference for Consumer Choice Across Many Product Categories

Taking Decisions Too Seriously: Why Maximizers Often Get Mired in Choices