Abstract:Problem definition: In this paper, we explore how a firm's concern about profit distribution and the size of downstream firms in supply chains affect corporate social responsibility (CSR) investment strategy. Methodology/results: In a supply chain consisting of one supplier and one manufacturer, both players decide whether to invest to reduce CSR violations, and they negotiate over a wholesale price. Distributive comparison behavior makes the manufacturer compare the profit with his equitable payoff, which is determined by the supplier's profit. Advantageous (resp. disadvantageous) inequality occurs when the manufacturer's profit is higher (resp. lower) than the manufacturer's equitable payoff. We compare this supply chain to the one without distributive comparison behavior. We find that when advantageous inequality occurs, or when neither inequality occurs and the manufacturer's sensitivity to the supplier's profit is low, the manufacturer's distributive comparison behavior makes the manufacturer less (resp. supplier more) likely to invest in CSR, which we call negative (resp. positive) impacts of distributive comparison behavior; otherwise, it makes the manufacturer more (resp. supplier less) likely to invest. In most cases, the weak bargaining power of the small manufacturer leads to larger positive or smaller negative impacts of distributive comparison behavior. Also, the low efficiency of the small manufacturer to reduce CSR violations leads to smaller negative impacts of distributive comparison behavior. Managerial implications: Our results show that governments and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) should investigate firms' distributive comparison behavior in supply chains. When downstream firms show the aversion to lower (resp. higher) profits than ones from upstream firms, the measures to monitor and support upstream (resp. downstream) firms' CSR investments should be taken to avoid CSR violations. In the supply chains with small downstream firms, extra efforts should be made to induce firms' distributive comparison behavior.

Corporate social responsibility, vertical product differentiation and international competition

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

Corporate social responsibility and tariff policy in a differentiated mixed duopoly

Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization

Foreign competition and corporate social responsibility: the role of the firm–government relationships

Non-cooperative corporate social responsibility, bargaining, and double marginalization in bilateral monopoly

How does corporate altruism affect oligopolistic competition?

To Introduce Competition or Not to Introduce Competition: an Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Investment Collaboration in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

Impacts of Distributional Social Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility: Power of the Small

Innovation As a Differentiation Strategy: Its Differential Substitution Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility

Impacts of Distributive Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: The Role of Small Firms

Consumption network externalities, corporate social responsibility, and conflicting interests: Cournot vs. Bertrand competition

The Curvilinear Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from China

Pricing Decision for a Supply Chain with Social-responsibility Concerned Retailer

Socially Responsible Supply Chains with Cost Learning Effects.

Substitutes or Complements: A Finer-grained Understanding of CSR Dimensions to an Exogenous Shock

When more competition may damage welfare with socially responsible firms

Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Preferential Stakeholder Model and Effects

Comparing ad valorem and specific taxes with corporate social responsibility

Import competition and domestic vertical integration: Theory and Evidence from Chinese firms