Abstract:This paper extends organizational research on distrust to explain the effects of organizational misconduct on continued market participation after a fraud. I argue that social relations between fraud victims and perpetrators insulate against the formation and diffusion of distrust. Variation in market participation after a fraud occurs because victims who belong to the perpetrator’s social group are more likely to attribute blame to the organization that committed the fraud, while victims from social out-groups are more likely to generalize blame to the perpetrator’s social group and subsequently avoid other organizations and institutions governed by its members. The empirical setting is Kenya’s ethnically diverse Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE), from which the country’s largest stockbrokerage was expelled in 2008 after defrauding one-quarter of its 100,000 clients. Analysis of NSE data on trades for victimized and non-victimized investors, as well as surnames that identify investors’ ethnicities, shows that clients from the same ethnic group as leaders of the corrupt brokerage are more likely than clients from rival ethnic groups to continue to participate in the market after a fraud and more likely to choose another intermediary operated by members of their ethnic group. But results also show that some victims invest more after the fraud and use less-trustworthy intermediaries to do so. This suggests that integrity-based trust may be a less effective coordination device in arm’s-length market transactions than in interpersonal transactions. A key implication is that misconduct does not simply reduce average participation in a market; it changes the market’s composition by filtering out diverse social groups that are more likely to demand stronger governance standards.

From Financial Misdemeanants to Recidivists: the Perspective of Social Networks

Social Trust and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Do Good Firms Necessarily Do Bad Things? Performance Aspiration, Ownership and Financial Fraud

Do Professional Managers Concern Their Market Reputation——An Evidence from Fraud Behaviors in China’s Securities Market

Financial Shared Service Centers and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Does Network Embeddedness Deter Corporate Fraud? Evidence from China

MARKET COMPETITION,MANAGER INCENTIVE,AND FRAUD BEHAVIOR OF LISTED COMPANIES——EVIDENCE FROM PUNISHMENT BULLETINS BY CSRC

Financial statement fraud, recidivism and punishment

Fraud Transmission Mechanisms Within Community: Peer Concealing and Hinting among Chinese Listed Corporations

The interpersonal diffusion mechanism of unethical behavior in groups: a social network perspective

Corporate Recidivism in Emerging Economies

Testing corporate immoral recidivism

How to Deter Financial Misconduct if Crime Pays?

Good Apples, Bad Apples: Sorting Among Chinese Companies Traded in the U.S.

Fraud and Market Participation: Social Relations as a Moderator of Organizational Misconduct

Corporate Governance, Reputation Mechanism and the Behavior of Listed Firms in Committing in Fraud

Not All Types of Social Networks Are Good: The Dual Effects of Social Networks on Courtesy Stigma

Identifying discreditable firms in a large-scale ownership network

Discriminant research on violations by listed firms based on fraud triangle

Top Managers' Characteristics and Financial Fraud Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Corporate Fraud, Risk Avoidance, and Housing Investment in China