Abstract:PurposeThis study aims to investigate the tendency for firms, exhibiting an entrepreneurial spirit in their growth strategies, to engage in misconduct within the context of China's rapidly developing economy. The authors also examine how this relationship is influenced by governance mechanisms, specifically management shareholding and executive functional diversity. Furthermore, the authors explore the mediating roles of organizational complexity and performance pressure in linking entrepreneurial growth to firm misconduct. This research provides a novel perspective for understanding the impact of entrepreneurial growth on corporate ethical risks, and offers practical insights for maintaining ethical standards in firms during their pursuit of growth.Design/methodology/approachThis study focuses on publicly traded, mature companies that exhibit an entrepreneurial inclination in their growth strategies, demonstrating entrepreneurial vigor through activities such as product innovation and market expansion. This exploration incorporates both theoretical and empirical approaches, scrutinizing A-share listed companies in China from 2008 to 2019. To validate the robustness of this study's findings, the authors have applied diverse methodologies such as propensity score matching, classification regression, and alternative indicator analysis.FindingsThis study found that the entrepreneurial growth-oriented strategy is positively related to firm misconduct. It also uncovers that governance mechanisms like management shareholding and executive functional diversity moderate this relationship. Moreover, organizational complexity and performance pressure partially mediate the relationship between an entrepreneurial growth strategy and firm misconduct.Research limitations/implicationsFor instance, more detailed categorization of corporate misconduct, based on punishment severity, could be explored. Additional characteristics like age, education, gender, and team/board diversity could help further understand the relationship between entrepreneurial growth strategy and misconduct. By addressing these limitations and exploring further avenues for research, the authors can deepen the understanding of this relationship and provide valuable insights for firms seeking to mitigate potential risks.Practical implicationsFirst, for regulators, shareholders, creditors and investors, knowing and understanding the relationship between growth-oriented strategies and corporate violations is helpful for them to scientifically evaluate the potential risks that may exist in the company, and can also carry out differentiated supervision on the company based on different types of company-oriented strategies. Second, when designing the corporate governance mechanism, listed companies should fully consider the role of management shareholding. Finally, executives should treat cross-functional experience dialectically, especially in growth oriented strategic companies.Social implicationsThis research provides a novel perspective for understanding the impact of entrepreneurial growth on corporate ethical risks, and offers practical insights for maintaining ethical standards in firms during their pursuit of growth.Originality/valueThis study stands out by examining the influence of entrepreneurial growth strategy on firm misconduct, thus enhancing previous studies that primarily centered on entrepreneurial start-ups. The authors offer a nuanced comprehension of the potential risks intrinsic to corporate entrepreneurship and highlight the crucial role of efficient governance structures in curbing corporate misbehavior while fostering entrepreneurial growth.

Corporate Recidivism in Emerging Economies

Testing corporate immoral recidivism

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Exploring the Linkages Between Firm Misconduct and Entrepreneurial Growth in China

Financial Shared Service Centers and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Financial statement fraud, recidivism and punishment

From Financial Misdemeanants to Recidivists: the Perspective of Social Networks

Corporate Philanthropy after Fraud Punishment: an Institutional Perspective

Overseas imprints reflected at home: returnee CEOs and corporate green innovation

Do CEOs with Sent-Down Movement Experience Foster Corporate Environmental Responsibility?

Regulatory Incentives for Earnings Management Through Asset Impairment Reversals in China

Alternative Governance and Corporate Financial Fraud in Transition Economies: Evidence From China

Too Much of a Good Thing? the Boomerang Effect of Firms’ Investments on Corporate Social Responsibility During Product Recalls

RETRACTED: The influencing factors and governance strategies of corporate misconduct from the perspective of collusion

Returnee Executives, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Stock Price Synchronicity

Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China

Corporate Incentives for Environmental Management in a Transitional Economy:Empirical Study in China

Corporate Social Responsibility and Investor Relations Management: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility: opportunistic behavior under earnings management?