Abstract:Government redistribution is increasingly important in today's world. The effect of income distribution on industrialization and growth, and the causes of income redistribution have been studied in the contemporary literature. The normative significance of income redistribution, however, which is the focus of this paper, has been rarely studied. In this paper we analyze how income redistribution makes a potential Pareto improvement. For a given amount of total income, redistributing more income to consumers who spend relatively more on more elastically supplied goods increases the aggregate expenditure on more elastically supplied goods, while reducing the aggregate expenditure on less elastically supplied goods at the same amount. This paper shows that such reallocation of expenditures results in an increase in the equilibrium output of more elastically supplied goods, more than compensating for the decrease in equilibrium output of less elastically supplied goods. The aggregate Marshallian consumer surplus is raised and the potential Pareto improvement is then achieved. A perfectly competitive market is Pareto optimal for any income distribution at the individual level: all consumers maximize utilities for given income distribution and firms maximize profits. However, the Pareto optimal at the individual level does not ensure that the potential Pareto optimal at aggregate level is realized due to income distribution non-optimality. It is usually believed that income redistribution is aimed to improve social justice. We show in this paper that income redistribution can significantly improve efficiency at aggregate level. Using an example, we show that redistribution can improve social welfare more than 25%. If rich people spend relatively more on inelastically supplied goods than poor people do, the improvements of social justice and aggregate efficiency could move in the same direction. We give a testable condition for efficiency improving redistribution in the general case: if the consumer's sum of expenditure shares, weighted by inverse of 1 plus elasticities of supplies is less than the others' sum, redistributing more income to the consumer will make the potential Pareto improvement.

Trade, Inequality and Distribution-neutral Fiscal Policy

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

Effectiveness of wealth-based vs exchange-based tax systems in reducing inequality

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Competitive Market Efficiency and Income Distribution Non-Optimality: A Theorem on Income Redistribution

Trade wars and trade disputes: The role of equity and political support

Tax Equity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Fiscal policy and inequality in a model with endogenous positional concerns

The political economy of inequality, mobility and redistribution

Consumer Heterogeneity, Free Trade, and the Welfare Impact of Income Redistribution

Fiscal policy and inequality in middle- and high-income countries: redistributive effects of tax and spending shocks

Redistributive Capacity and International Trade: A Cross-Country Analysis

Optimal Central Redistribution with Decentralized Redistribution

Nonlinear redistribution of wealth from a stochastic approach

Income Inequality, Tax Policy, and Economic Growth

The dynamics of redistribution, inequality and growth across China's regions

FDI inflows and income inequality: A Schumpeterian economic growth

Poverty, redistribution, and the middle class: redistribution via probability distributions vs. redistribution via the linear income tax system

Income inequality and structures of international trade

Trade openness, FDI, and income inequality: Evidence from sub‐Saharan Africa

Trade and inequality in an overlapping generations model with capital accumulation