Abstract:Government redistribution is increasingly important in today's world. The effect of income distribution on industrialization and growth, and the causes of income redistribution have been studied in the contemporary literature. The normative significance of income redistribution, however, which is the focus of this paper, has been rarely studied. In this paper we analyze how income redistribution makes a potential Pareto improvement. For a given amount of total income, redistributing more income to consumers who spend relatively more on more elastically supplied goods increases the aggregate expenditure on more elastically supplied goods, while reducing the aggregate expenditure on less elastically supplied goods at the same amount. This paper shows that such reallocation of expenditures results in an increase in the equilibrium output of more elastically supplied goods, more than compensating for the decrease in equilibrium output of less elastically supplied goods. The aggregate Marshallian consumer surplus is raised and the potential Pareto improvement is then achieved. A perfectly competitive market is Pareto optimal for any income distribution at the individual level: all consumers maximize utilities for given income distribution and firms maximize profits. However, the Pareto optimal at the individual level does not ensure that the potential Pareto optimal at aggregate level is realized due to income distribution non-optimality. It is usually believed that income redistribution is aimed to improve social justice. We show in this paper that income redistribution can significantly improve efficiency at aggregate level. Using an example, we show that redistribution can improve social welfare more than 25%. If rich people spend relatively more on inelastically supplied goods than poor people do, the improvements of social justice and aggregate efficiency could move in the same direction. We give a testable condition for efficiency improving redistribution in the general case: if the consumer's sum of expenditure shares, weighted by inverse of 1 plus elasticities of supplies is less than the others' sum, redistributing more income to the consumer will make the potential Pareto improvement.

Consumer Heterogeneity, Free Trade, and the Welfare Impact of Income Redistribution

International Trade with Social Comparisons

Heterogeneous Productivity and the Gains from Trade and FDI

Competitive Market Efficiency and Income Distribution Non-Optimality: A Theorem on Income Redistribution

Consumption Fluctuations and Welfare: Evidence from China

Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: an Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem

Export, FDI and the welfare gains from trade liberalization

Will China's Demographic Transition Exacerbate Its Income Inequality?–cge Modeling with Top-Down Microsimulation

A note on heterogeneity, trade integration and spatial inequality

A Comparison of Optimal Tariffs and Welfare under No Lobbying, Domestic Lobbying and Domestic‐foreign Lobbying

Welfare Implications of Switching to Consumption Taxation

The puzzle of quality upgrading of Chinese exports from the trade liberalization perspective

A Welfare Analysis of Tariffs and Equivalent Quotas under Demand Uncertainty: Implications for Tariffication

Fixed export cost heterogeneity, trade and welfare

Market size, income heterogeneity, and trade

Evaluating Trade Reform with Many Consumers

Trade Reforms and Current Account Imbalances: when Does the General Equilibrium Effect Overturn a Partial Equilibrium Intuition?

Trade and Welfare Effects of Export Tax: Theory and Evidence from China's Incomplete Export VAT Rebate

Redistributive Capacity and International Trade: A Cross-Country Analysis

Consumer Heterogeneity and Inefficiency in Oligopoly Markets

The Welfare Loss of the Current Account Adjustment: an Analysis Based on a Two-Country Model