Abstract:Financial capital and fixed capital tend to flow in opposite directions between poor and rich countries. Why? What are the implications of such two-way capital flows for global trade imbalances and welfare in the long run? This paper introduces frictions into a standard two- country neoclassical growth model to explain the pattern of two-way capital flows between emerging economies (such as China) and the developed world (such as the United States). We show how underdeveloped credit markets in China can lead to abnormally high rate of returns to fixed capital but excessively low rate of returns to financial capital relative to the U.S., hence driving out household savings (financial capital) on the one hand while simultaneously attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) on the other. When calibrated to match China’s high marginal product of capital and low real interest rate, the model is able to account for the observed rising trends of China’s financial capital outflows and FDI inflows as well as its massive trade imbalances. Despite double heterogeneity in households and firms and a less than 100% capital depreciation rate, our two-country model is analytically tractable with closed form solutions at the micro level, which permits exact aggregation by the law of large numbers, so the general equilibrium of the model can be solved by standard log-linearization or higher order perturbation methods without the need of using numerical computation methods. Our model yield, among other things, three implications that stand in sharp contrast with the existing literature: (i) Global trade imbalances between emerging economies and the developed world are sustainable even in the steady state. (ii) There exists an immiserization effect of FDI --- namely, FDI is beneficial for the sourcing country but harmful to the recipient country under financial frictions. (iii) Our quantitative results cast doubts on the conventional wisdom that the saving glut of emerging economies is responsible for the low world interest rate.>

Trade Reforms and Current Account Imbalances: when Does the General Equilibrium Effect Overturn a Partial Equilibrium Intuition?

Trade reforms and current account imbalances

Nber working paper series trade reforms and current account imbalances

Trade Liberalizations and Global Current Account Imbalances

Are Trade Liberalizations a Source of Global Current Account Imbalances?

Impacts of Trade Liberalization on Chinese Economy with Belt and Road Initiative

Are Trade Liberalizations a Source of Global Imbalances?

Asymmetric Trade Reforms and External Adjustment: Theory and Evidence from China

Comparative Advantage, Endowment Structure, and Trade Imbalances

Current Account Adjustment, Goods Trade, and Labor Market Rigidity: Theory and Some Evidence

Current Account Adjustment: Some New Theory and Evidence

On the Connections Between Intra-Temporal and Intertemporal Trades

The Impact of FDI on China's Current Account in the Balance of Payments:An Empirical Analysis from 1982 to 2006

Two-Way Capital Flows and Global Imbalances: A Neoclassical Approach

Effect of Trade Openness on Regional Economic Growth in China: Revisiting the Discussion

The Welfare Loss of the Current Account Adjustment: an Analysis Based on a Two-Country Model

Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: an Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem

The Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Trade Balance in Developing Countries

The research of exchange rate change, export structure and international trade welfare effect

Correcting China's trade imbalance: Monetary means will not suffice

Causes and Remedies of Chinaâ€™s External Imbalances