Fiscal policy and inequality in middle- and high-income countries: redistributive effects of tax and spending shocks

Abdulaleem Isiaka,Alexander Mihailov,Giovanni Razzu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100524000142
2024-04-17
Macroeconomic Dynamics
Abstract:Motivated by the sharp increases in public spending following the global financial crisis, we employ the GMM Panel VAR approach at annual frequency between 2004 and 2014 to investigate the dynamic response of alternative income distribution variables to shocks imposed on tax revenues and three key components of social expenditures: social protection, health, and education. We confirm the potential of fiscal policy to reduce income inequality in the medium to longer run, but point to the differential approaches to pursue such a goal in middle- versus high-income countries. We find that the particular expenditure component under consideration matters in terms of the dynamic effect on inequality and on different parts of the income distribution, as well as in terms of the implied time profile. In middle-income countries, positive education spending shocks are the most effective in achieving better distributional outcomes over a medium run of several years. By contrast, in high-income countries, positive health spending and tax shocks have a more pronounced favorable dynamic distributional effect.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily explores the impact of fiscal policy (including taxation and public expenditure) on income inequality, particularly the differences between middle-income and high-income countries. The study examines the dynamic effects of unexpected changes in tax revenue and three key social expenditures (social security, healthcare, and education spending) on income distribution using a Panel Vector Autoregression (Panel VAR) model. ### Research Objectives 1. **How do unexpected changes in taxation and public expenditure affect income distribution in middle-income countries in the medium term?** 2. **How do these fiscal shocks' impacts on income inequality differ from those in high-income countries?** 3. **What measures can fiscal policy take to reduce income inequality, and are these measures different between middle-income and high-income countries?** ### Key Findings - In middle-income countries, positive education expenditure shocks are most effective in improving income distribution over the medium term. - In contrast, in high-income countries, positive healthcare expenditure and tax shocks have more significant favorable dynamic effects on income distribution. - The specific components of expenditure are crucial for their dynamic effects, impacting not only overall income inequality but also different parts of the income distribution (low-income, middle-income, and high-income groups). - Unexpected increases in tax revenue neither reduced inequality nor significantly benefited the studied income groups. - Fiscal policy has the potential to reduce income inequality, but the approaches differ between middle-income and high-income countries. ### Methodological Contributions - Unlike other literature, this paper uniquely examines the medium- to long-term dynamic effects of fiscal policy variables on income inequality, rather than just focusing on immediate effects. - The study employs the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) Panel Vector Autoregression approach to control for the persistence of income inequality and reverse causality issues. - It analyzes three different parts of the income distribution (low-income, middle-income, and high-income groups), allowing for a discussion on whether fiscal shocks tend to favor the rich, the middle class, or the poor. In summary, this paper provides policymakers with important insights on how to design effective fiscal policy tools to promote a more equitable income distribution through an in-depth analysis of the impact of fiscal policy on income inequality.