Facile Fabrication of Flexible Pressure Sensor with Programmable Lattice Structure
Yi Ming Yin,Hua Yang Li,Jin Xu,Chen Zhang,Fei Liang,Xin Li,Yang Jiang,Jin Wei Cao,Han Fang Feng,Jia Nan Mao,Ling Qin,Yi Fan Kang,Guang Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c21407
2021-02-19
Abstract:Flexible pressure sensors have attracted intense attention because of their widespread applications in electronic skin, human–machine interfaces, and healthcare monitoring. Conductive porous structures are always utilized as active layers to improve the sensor sensitivities. However, flexible pressure sensors derived from traditional foaming techniques have limited structure designability. Besides, random pore distribution causes difference in structure and signal repeatability between different samples even in one batch, therefore limiting the batch production capabilities. Herein, we introduce a structure designable lattice structure pressure sensor (LPS) produced by bottom-up digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technique, which is capable of efficiently producing 55 high fidelity lattice structure models in 30 min. The LPS shows high sensitivity (1.02 kPa<sup>–1</sup>) with superior linearity over a wide pressure range (0.7 Pa to 160 kPa). By adjusting the design parameters such as lattice type and layer thickness, the electrical sensitivities and mechanical properties of LPS can be accurately controlled. In addition, the LPS endures up to 60000 compression cycles (at 10 kPa) without any obvious electrical signal degradation. This benefits from the firm carbon nanotubes (CNTs) coating derived from high-energy ultrasonic probe and the subsequent thermal curing process of UV-heat dual-curing photocurable resin. For practical applications, the LPS is used for real time pulse monitoring, voice recognition and Morse code communication. Furthermore, the LPS is also integrated to make a flexible 4 × 4 sensor arrays for detecting spatial pressure distribution and a flexible insole for foot pressure monitoring.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c21407?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c21407</a>.Comparison of additive manufacturing techniques for preparation of porous materials for flexible electronics; optical photographs of the lattice structure green model after DLP 3D printing and after CNT coating; SEM images of bare TPU substrate and CNT-coated sample; cross-section SEM image of CNT-coated sample; tensile stress-strain curves of 3D printed pure TPU compared to PDMS and Ecoflex 00-10; optical and SEM images of conductive fabric interdigital electrode; optical photograph of LPS under a compression and release cycle at a compression rate of 0.1 mm/s; optical images of the LPSs with three lattice types ("A", "D" and "E") at various applied pressure; compressive stress–strain curves of LPSs with 5 types of lattice structure; cyclic compression test under 40 kPa at different frequencies; SEM images of LPS sample after 60 000 cycles compression test at 10 kPa with a frequency of 0.5 Hz; current response of LPS attached on the throat when saying "Printing" and "What's up"; SEM images of the surface morphology of papers with different roughness (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c21407/suppl_file/am0c21407_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology