Abstract:Importance: Venous thromboembolism is the second overall leading cause of death for patients with cancer, and there is an approximately 2-fold increase in fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with cancer. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are designed to prevent PE, but defining the appropriate use of IVC filters in patients with cancer remains a substantial unmet clinical need. Objective: To evaluate the association of IVC filters with the development of PE in patients with cancer and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Design, setting, and participants: A population-based cohort study was conducted using administrative data on 88 585 patients from the state inpatient databases for California (2005-2011) and Florida (2005-2014). Based on diagnostic and procedure codes, patients with cancer and acute lower extremity DVT were identified. All subsequent hospital visits for these patients were evaluated for the placement of an IVC filter, the development of new PE, the development of new DVT, and in-hospital mortality. Data analysis was performed from September 1 to December 1, 2019. Exposures: Placement of an IVC filter. Main outcomes and measures: The association of IVC filter placement with rates of new PE and DVT was estimated using a propensity score matching algorithm and competing risk analysis. Results: The study cohort comprised 88 585 patients (45 074 male; median age, 71.0 years [range, 1.0-104.0 years]) with malignant neoplasms who presented to a health care institution with a diagnosis of acute lower extremity DVT. Of these patients, 33 740 (38.1%) underwent IVC filter placement; patients with risk factors such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37), intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.24), and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.10) were more likely to receive an IVC filter. A total of 4492 patients (5.1%) developed a new PE after their initial DVT diagnosis. There was a significant improvement in PE-free survival for these patients compared with those who did not receive IVC filters across the full, unbalanced study cohort as well as after propensity score matching and competing risk analysis (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.75; P < .001). Furthermore, IVC filter placement reduced the development of PE in patients with very high-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, pancreaticobiliary cancer), high-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, lung cancer), and low-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, prostate cancer). After accounting for anticoagulation use and imbalanced risk factors, IVC filter placement did not increase the risk of new DVT development. Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that, for patients with cancer and DVT and bleeding risk factors, IVC filter placement is associated with an increased rate of PE-free survival.

03:27 PM Abstract No. 154 Venous Thromboembolic (VTE) Readmission Outcomes for Cancer Vs Non-Cancer Patients with IVC Filter

Association of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement With Rates of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Cancer and Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Inferior vena cava filter thromboprophylaxis in surgical cancer patients

Factors Associated With Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval for Patients With Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Comparison of inferior vena cava filter use and outcomes between cancer and non-cancer patients in a tertiary hospital

Outcomes after Vena Cava Filter Use in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism and Contraindications to Anticoagulation

Long-term effects of non-retrieved inferior vena cava filters on recurrences of venous thromboembolism in cancer and non-cancer patients: From the COMMAND VTE registry

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: an 18 Year Single Center Experience

Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Cancer Patients: On Whom Should We Be Placing Them?

Incidence and risk factors for inferior vena cava filter thrombosis detected at time of filter retrieval in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Venous Thrombosis Recurrence After Catheter-Related Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Clinical follow-up of patients with percutaneously inserted inferior vena caval filters

Outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients with cancer

Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter: Should a Computed Tomography (CT) Venogram and Inferior Vena Cavagram Be the Standard of Care?

Inferior vena cava filter use at a large community hospital: a retrospective cohort study

Independent association between IVC filter placement and VTE risk in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and isolated distal DVT: A retrospective cohort study

[A Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Intraluminal Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter for the Lower Extremity Trauma Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis].

[Efficacy of Anticoagulation on Patency Post-Permanent Inferior Vena Caval Filter Placements].

Catheter and Non-Catheter-Related Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Survival, Anticoagulation Efficacy, and Safety

The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Patterns of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients Followed Up by Ultrasound

Vena Cava Thrombosis after Vena Cava Filter Placement: Incidence and Risk Factors.