Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Cancer Patients: On Whom Should We Be Placing Them?

Marcelo Passos Teivelis,Isabela Hohlenwerger Schettini,Bruno Soriano Pignataro,Guilherme Andre Zottele Bomfim,Guilherme Centofanti,Igor Yoshio Imagawa Fonseca,Mariana Krutman,Rafael Noronha Cavalcante,Kenji Nishinari,Guilherme Yazbek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.123
IF: 1.5
2021-02-01
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:BackgroundStandard treatment for venous thromboembolism is anticoagulation; vena cava filter placement is an alternative in special situations. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes in cancer patients undergoing filter placement in a cancer center during a 10-year-period and assess which preoperatory variables were associated with poorer survival.MethodsRetrospective uni-center analysis over a 10-year period was carried out in cancer patients who had undergone placement of vena cava filter. Early deaths were those that occurred less than 30 days after the filter placement, or that occurred during the same hospital stay of the placementResults250 patients were analyzed. 51.6% were female; 77.2% had proximal lower limb DVT; 34.8% had contraindications to anticoagulation; 32.8% presented bleeding after the onset of anticoagulation and 18.4% had the filter implanted because they were going to undergo surgery, and could not be anticoagulated immediately after. 51.2% of the filters were removable.However, only 2 had the filter removed. 59.2% had metastatic disease at the time of filter placement. 31.2% fulfilled criteria for "early" death. Of those, 34 patients were put in palliative care after filter insertion (median=13.5 days). Body mass index> 18kg/m2, absence of metastatic disease and filter placement during the same anesthesia of another surgery (especially if elective and curative) were associated with a higher chance of survivalConclusionMultidisciplinary evaluation (and possibly consideration for palliation) should take place before the decision to insert a vena cava filter in severe oncological cases depending on overall status. Patients with a greater chance of survival at a 3 or 5 years interval seem to be those whose filters were placed in the peri-operative context of other surgeries (specially elective and curative), who were not undernourished and whose disease was not metastatic at that time. For patients who survived, an active investigation protocol for filter removal should be implemented.
surgery,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?