Abstract:Importance: Venous thromboembolism is the second overall leading cause of death for patients with cancer, and there is an approximately 2-fold increase in fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with cancer. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are designed to prevent PE, but defining the appropriate use of IVC filters in patients with cancer remains a substantial unmet clinical need. Objective: To evaluate the association of IVC filters with the development of PE in patients with cancer and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Design, setting, and participants: A population-based cohort study was conducted using administrative data on 88 585 patients from the state inpatient databases for California (2005-2011) and Florida (2005-2014). Based on diagnostic and procedure codes, patients with cancer and acute lower extremity DVT were identified. All subsequent hospital visits for these patients were evaluated for the placement of an IVC filter, the development of new PE, the development of new DVT, and in-hospital mortality. Data analysis was performed from September 1 to December 1, 2019. Exposures: Placement of an IVC filter. Main outcomes and measures: The association of IVC filter placement with rates of new PE and DVT was estimated using a propensity score matching algorithm and competing risk analysis. Results: The study cohort comprised 88 585 patients (45 074 male; median age, 71.0 years [range, 1.0-104.0 years]) with malignant neoplasms who presented to a health care institution with a diagnosis of acute lower extremity DVT. Of these patients, 33 740 (38.1%) underwent IVC filter placement; patients with risk factors such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37), intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.24), and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.10) were more likely to receive an IVC filter. A total of 4492 patients (5.1%) developed a new PE after their initial DVT diagnosis. There was a significant improvement in PE-free survival for these patients compared with those who did not receive IVC filters across the full, unbalanced study cohort as well as after propensity score matching and competing risk analysis (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.75; P < .001). Furthermore, IVC filter placement reduced the development of PE in patients with very high-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, pancreaticobiliary cancer), high-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, lung cancer), and low-risk malignant neoplasms (eg, prostate cancer). After accounting for anticoagulation use and imbalanced risk factors, IVC filter placement did not increase the risk of new DVT development. Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that, for patients with cancer and DVT and bleeding risk factors, IVC filter placement is associated with an increased rate of PE-free survival.

Outcomes after Vena Cava Filter Use in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism and Contraindications to Anticoagulation

Comparison of inferior vena cava filter use and outcomes between cancer and non-cancer patients in a tertiary hospital

Factors Associated With Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval for Patients With Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Association of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement With Rates of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Cancer and Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Cancer Patients: On Whom Should We Be Placing Them?

Inferior vena cava filter thromboprophylaxis in surgical cancer patients

Clinical Correlates of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

Long-term effects of non-retrieved inferior vena cava filters on recurrences of venous thromboembolism in cancer and non-cancer patients: From the COMMAND VTE registry

[A Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Intraluminal Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter for the Lower Extremity Trauma Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis].

Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Vade Mecum for the Treating Physicians: A Narrative Review

Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters

Independent association between IVC filter placement and VTE risk in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and isolated distal DVT: A retrospective cohort study

Incidence and risk factors for inferior vena cava filter thrombosis detected at time of filter retrieval in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Inferior vena cava filter use at a large community hospital: a retrospective cohort study

[Efficacy of Anticoagulation on Patency Post-Permanent Inferior Vena Caval Filter Placements].

Prophylactic IVC filter placement in patients with severe intracranial, spinal cord, and orthopedic injuries at high thromboembolic event risk: A utilization and outcomes analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank

Role of prophylactic filter placement in the endovascular treatment of symptomatic thrombosis in the central veins

Temporary inferior vena cava filters factors associated with non-removal

Treatment for Thrombosis Secondary to the Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement

Inferior vena cava filters: Concept review and summary of current guidelines

Characterization and Risk Factors of Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis in Situ Detected by CT Venography Following Filter placement: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study