Abstract:The long tradition of research on cooperation includes a well-established finding that individuals respond to the degree of conflict between self- and collective interests (that is, the relative benefits from cooperation) in providing public goods. Existing empirical evidence builds upon settings where participants make multiple decisions or strategically consider alternative scenarios. Here, we consider a decision setting where participants face a one-time (single-decision) setting. One-time cooperative encounters often occur in volunteering or donating to immediate needs for crisis relief. For these distinct and highly relevant settings, we report a lack of responsiveness to increases in cooperation benefits, thereby highlighting limits to our understanding of the determinants of one-time cooperation encounters. Across two studies, n = 2,232 individuals participate in treatments where we vary across participants the relative benefit from contributing to a public good (that is, the marginal per capita return, the MPCR). We examine decisions from alternative participant pools (UK general population vs. students), implementations varying the physical distance between participants (online vs. in the laboratory), and more complex decision settings considering group-to-group interactions including not only providers but also donors to public goods. Throughout, neither average contribution levels, nor the distribution of contributions are significantly affected by the increases in cooperation benefits. The mechanism behind these results can be explained by the close correlation between expectations of other's cooperation and own cooperation, and the fact that these expectations do not increase with higher benefits from cooperation.

Does Overconfidence Promote Cooperation? Theory and Experimental Evidence

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Beyond a binary theorizing of prosociality

When greediness and self-confidence meet in a social dilemma

Overfeed the Bold, Starve the Cowardly: A Legend or Reality?

Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games

Bluffing Promotes Overconfidence on Social Networks

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

Bounded Rationality in Volunteering Public Goods Games.

Common Knowledge Promotes Cooperation in the Threshold Public Goods Game by Reducing Uncertainty

Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments

Effect of Overconfidence on Cournot Competition in the Presence of Yield Uncertainty

Promoting Cooperation by Setting a Ceiling Payoff for Defectors under Three-Strategy Public Good Games.

Cooperation and confusion in public goods games: confusion cannot explain contribution patterns

Positive interactions promote public cooperation

Onymity Promotes Cooperation in Social Dilemma Experiments

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Are teams conditionally cooperative? Experimental evidence from a public goods game

Extortion outperforms generosity in iterated Prisoners' Dilemma

Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games