Polyethylene glycol/polylactic acid block co‐polymers as solid–solid phase change materials
Xiang Y. D. Soo,Joseph K. Muiruri,Jayven C. C. Yeo,Zhuang M. Png,Anqi Sng,Huiqing Xie,Rong Ji,Suxi Wang,Hongfei Liu,Jianwei Xu,Xian J. Loh,Qingyu Yan,Zibiao Li,Qiang Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smm2.1188
2023-02-17
SmartMat
Abstract:Chemical linking strategies are superior compared to physical mixing of phase change materials composites in maintaining form‐stability. This study provides a comparison of chemically synthesized mPEG/PLA copolymer with physically mixed PEG:PLA composites, investigating mass loss and change in latent heat before and after leakage test, and their thermal and form‐stability. Phase change materials (PCMs) are promising thermal energy storage materials due to their high specific latent heat. Conventional PCMs typically exploit the solid–liquid (s–l) transition. However, leakage and leaching are common issues for solid–liquid PCMs, which have to be addressed before usage in practical applications. In contrast, solid–solid (s–s) PCMs would naturally overcome these issues due to their inherent form stability and homogeneity. In this study, we report a new type of s–s PCM based on chemically linked polyethylene glycol (PEG, the PCM portion) with polylactic acid (PLA, the support portion) in the form of a block co‐polymer. Solid‐solid latent heat of up to 56 J/g could be achieved, with melting points of between 44 °C and 55 °C. For comparison, PEG was physically mixed into a PLA matrix to form a PEG:PLA composite. However, the composite material saw leakage of up to 9% upon heating, with a corresponding loss in thermal storage capacity. In contrast, the mPEG/PLA block co‐polymers were found to be completely homogeneous and thermally stable even when heated above its phase transition temperature, with no observable leakage, demonstrating the superiority of chemical linking strategies in ensuring form stability.