The leverage of sea power
Carnes Lord
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2021.1880839
2021-03-04
Comparative Strategy
Abstract:1 Colin S. Gray, The Leverage of Sea Power: The Strategic Advantage of Navies in War (New York: The Free Press, 1992).2 C. E. Callwell, Military Operations and Maritime Preponderance: Their Relationship and Interdependence, with an introduction and notes by Colin S. Gray (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1996).3 Cf. The Leverage of Sea Power, 22, 274–76.4 Colin S. Gray, War, Peace, and Victory: Strategy and Statecraft for the Next Century (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990), ch. 2.5 The Leverage of Sea Power, 94.6 "Without advancing any grandiose claims for universal application in all periods, it is my contention that the focusing of a spotlight upon the continental/maritime distinction can help clarify a great deal about strategy, statecraft, and war. With only the rarest of exceptions, and none of those in modern times,, every country has a principal environmental orientation to its security concerns, either maritime or continental. The advent of air and missile technologies has not introduced a third environmental option for national military focus alternative to the land or the sea (there are no air-power or missile-power states!)." War, Peace, and Victory, 57.7 For an extended discussion of the "limitations or weaknesses" of Clausewitz' On War, see Colin S. Gray, Modern Strategy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 100–12. This same work has an entire chapter on "The Poverty of Modern Strategic Thought" (ch. 4). Consider also Gray's frequently harsh assessments of individual theorists in The Strategy Bridge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 198–201, 239–43.8 The Leverage of Sea Power, 113–17.9 "The principal maritime theorists still (variably) revered today, Alfred T. Mahan and Julian S. Corbett (though not in a class with Clausewitz as theorists of war), generally were as unbalanced in their treatment of what one may call national military strategy as was Clausewitz." War, Peace, and Victory, 57.10 Ibid., 17–18.11 The Leverage of Sea Power, 85–7.12 Ibid., 80–5.13 Andrew S. Erickson, Lyle J. Goldstein, and Carnes Lord, eds., China Goes to Sea: Maritime Transformation in Comparative Historical Perspective (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2009).14 The Leverage of Sea Power, 84–5.