Abstract:Despite the increased emphasis on domestic politics in the study of international law, scholars remain divided about whether and how international law affects domestic institutions. Moreover, while public support is a core ingredient for sustainable, legitimate policies in a democracy, research at the individual level of analysis remains limited. Weighing in on these areas of study, we investigate the use of drone strikes for counterterrorism, a subject of considerable debate. Proponents in the government point to drones as both effective for disrupting terrorist networks and compatible with international law. Critics from groups such as international organizations (IOs) and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) respond that attacks create more terrorists than they kill and violate legal commitments. The central question we ask in this article is whether these international legal criticisms impact public support for drone strikes, the centerpiece of US counterterrorism policy, or whether individuals are more persuaded by effectiveness-based arguments. Employing a survey experiment of a nationally representative sample of the United States, we find IO and NGO criticisms can shape public attitudes even around an important national security issue like drone strikes, but are most influential when messages center on legal critiques rather than matters of effectiveness. Our findings speak to fundamental questions about the domestic politics of international legal commitments, the role of IOs and NGOs in shaping political debates, and the durability of US counterterrorism policy.

Peace at Home, Conflict Abroad: Government Ideology, Mission Type, and Parliamentary Support for Military Interventions

A Theory of External Wars and European Parliaments

The Party Politics of Foreign and Security Policy

Inward Bound: Domestic Institutions and Military Conflicts

Peace and war in the political discourse of Italian Marxist and post-Marxist parties

Towards parliamentarisation of foreign and security policy?

Political and Economic Consequences of Humanitarian Military Interventions in Targeted Nations

America'S Military Interventionism: A Social Evolutionary Interpretation

Role-theoretic discourse analysis of German security policy: a case of German parliamentary debate on the mission in Afghanistan

Foreign Military Intervention and Cabinet Government Stability

International law, military effectiveness, and public support for drone strikes

Parliaments in security policy: Involvement, politicisation, and influence

Does women's political empowerment matter in military spending?

Ideology and armed conflict

Mediation, Military, and Money: The Promises and Pitfalls of Outside Interventions to End Armed Conflicts

Conflict, Peace, and the Evolution of Women's Empowerment

Prime minister leadership style and the role of parliament in security policy

Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War

Who follows whom? A coincidence analysis of military action, public opinion and threats

A Two-Dimensional Analysis of Seventy Years of United Nations Voting

The Role of Foreign Aid in Procuring Civil War Party Consent to Peacekeeping