Abstract:In regional economic development,why are the Chinese local governments' roles so different? Applying the quantitative method,we have compared the nominees of the five China Local Government Innovation Awards(2001-2010) and analyzed the inter-regional,inter-category and cross-year data of these nominees to probe into the correlation between the economic growth and the local government innovations in the eastern,central and western regions of China. The number of innovations of the local governments in the eastern region is far above that in the western and the central regions,and the number is greater in the urban area than in the rural area,both of which indicate the relationship between innovative ideas and economic growth. There is a significant inter-regional difference in the innovation types.The eastern region,with a higher level of economic development,centers around administrative innovations to meet the demand of market institutional development.One strong incentive to the political innovation in this region is economy.At the same time,its public service innovation is more effective than that in the western and the central regions.The central region has more political innovations;however,the governments in the western region show greater vitality in all kinds of innovations than the central region. Correlation Analysis has testified the significance of correlation between the administrative innovation and the economic growth.We also find that with economic development the local government innovations have gradually switched from political reform to administrative management,but attention has not sufficiently been paid to public service innovations. Therefore,the regional economic growth gives the local governments an endogenous incentive to innovate and there is more vitality in innovation in the developed areas than the undeveloped ones.On one hand,government innovations have greatly promoted the local economic development and regional marketization process and provided the necessary local experiences for the overall economic institutional reform.On the other hand the local government innovation becomes the crucial element for Chinese government innovation. The policy implication of this research for Chinese social transformation is that the state government should ensure greater policy incentive and leave institutional space for local government innovations in their regional development.China's central government should set up an overall and top-down system of power decentralization and provide the institutional incentive for local governments to implement public service and political innovations.At the same time,the central government should put stress on local innovative autonomy which generates the ability to solve local problems.China cannot rely on the local economic development alone for its innovation incentive.Rather,it must push for the reform of political decentralization so as to guarantee the central authority and local autonomy.

Innovation or imitation – a comparison of performance evaluation models in China

INNOVATION IN THE CHINESE PUBLIC SECTOR: TYPOLOGY AND DISTRIBUTION

Assessment of Innovative Performance Management in Chinese Police System

A Comparative Study between Chinese and American Government Innovation Awards Programs

The Paradox of More Performance Evaluations but Less Performance Achievements in Local Government: A Probe into 42 Evaluation Models in China

Xiaonengjianshe in the Comparative Perspective:Performance Improvement,Innovation and Service Oriented Government

The Local Governments' Impetus for Innovations,their Characteristics and the Related Performance:An Analysis of the Test of Cases Adopted from "The Awards for Innovation to China's Local Governments"

State-Firm Strategic Coordination and Technological Innovation in Shanghai and Shenzhen: A Comparative Study

Local Government Innovation and Revealed Ideas of Political Legitimacy: A Comparative Study Between the United States and China

A comparison between public sector performance evaluation studies in China and USA——Based on the data from 2002 to 2007 in Public Administration Review and Chinese Public Administration

Innovation Performance Evaluation Based on the Nonlinear Principal Components Analysis

Policy Experiments:Start -up Mechanisms and Internal Logic---Case Studies on the Performance Management Policies in China’s Public Sectors

The Correlation between Regional Economic Growth and Local Government Innovations:An Inter-case Analysis of the Differences between Chinese Local Governments

Resolving the Widespread Malpractice of One-vote Veto Performance Evaluation in China' S Local Governments:An Unobtrusive Post Positivism Study Based on 356 Cases

La Diffusion De L’innovation Dans Le Gouvernement Local En Chine : Analyse De La Séquence Des Événements Dans Le Cadre D’un Programme De Réformes Basées Sur La Performance

Political Incentives and Local Policy Innovations in China

“Honor List” and “shame Roll”: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of the Effect of Performance Feedback under Political Control

Policy Innovation of Local Officials in China: the Administrative Choice

Performance-Based Budgeting and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Can Innovation Incentive Policies Improve the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers? Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

The Motivation, Characteristics and Performance of Chinese Local Education System Innovation:Based on the Test Analysis of The"awards for China's Local Education System Innovation"