Which Oxidant is Really Responsible for Sulfur Oxidation by Cytochrome P450?
Chunsen Li,Lixian Zhang,Chi Zhang,Hajime Hirao,Wei Wu,Sason Shaik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200702867
2007-01-01
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Abstract:Angewandte Chemie International EditionVolume 46, Issue 43 p. 8168-8170 Communication Which Oxidant Is Really Responsible for Sulfur Oxidation by Cytochrome P450?† Correction(s) for this article Which Oxidant is Really Responsible for Sulfur Oxidation by Cytochrome P450? Chunsen Li, Lixian Zhang, Chi Zhang, Hajime Hirao, Wei Wu Prof. Dr., Sason Shaik Prof. Dr., Volume 47Issue 43Angewandte Chemie International Edition pages: 8148-8148 First Published online: October 10, 2008 Chunsen Li, Chunsen Li The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorLixian Zhang, Lixian Zhang The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorChi Zhang, Chi Zhang The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorHajime Hirao, Hajime Hirao Department of Organic Chemistry and The Lise Meitner-Minerva Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel, Fax: (+972) 2-6584680Search for more papers by this authorWei Wu Prof. Dr., Wei Wu Prof. Dr. [email protected] The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorSason Shaik Prof. Dr., Sason Shaik Prof. Dr. [email protected] Department of Organic Chemistry and The Lise Meitner-Minerva Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel, Fax: (+972) 2-6584680Search for more papers by this author Chunsen Li, Chunsen Li The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorLixian Zhang, Lixian Zhang The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorChi Zhang, Chi Zhang The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorHajime Hirao, Hajime Hirao Department of Organic Chemistry and The Lise Meitner-Minerva Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel, Fax: (+972) 2-6584680Search for more papers by this authorWei Wu Prof. Dr., Wei Wu Prof. Dr. [email protected] The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Center for Theoretical Chemistry, and Department of Chemistry, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China, Fax: (+86) 592-2184708Search for more papers by this authorSason Shaik Prof. Dr., Sason Shaik Prof. Dr. [email protected] Department of Organic Chemistry and The Lise Meitner-Minerva Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel, Fax: (+972) 2-6584680Search for more papers by this author First published: 26 October 2007 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200702867Citations: 65 † W.W. is supported by grants from the NSF/NBRP of China (20533020/2004CB719902). S.S. is supported by BMBF (grant DIP-G.7.1). H.H. was supported by JSPS. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Graphical Abstract Clarifying a conundrum: The question of whether Compound I or Compound 0 (Cpd I or Cpd 0) is the reactive oxidant in the sulfoxidation of thiafatty acids by P450 is addressed by theory, which demonstrates that Cpd I leads to an extremely fast process, while Cpd 0 is at least six orders of magnitude slower. Most likely, thiafatty acids promote Cpd I formation even in the T→A mutant of P450BM3. Citing Literature Supporting Information Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.wiley-vch.de/contents/jc_2002/2007/z702867_s.pdf or from the author. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Volume46, Issue43November 5, 2007Pages 8168-8170 RelatedInformation