Influence of Annealing on Mechanical Αc‐relaxation of Isotactic Polypropylene: A Study from the Intermediate Phase Perspective

Baobao Chang,Konrad Schneider,Roland Vogel,Gert Heinrich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201700291
2017-01-01
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
Abstract:The influence of annealing on mechanical alpha(c)-relaxation of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is investigated. In the sample without annealing, polymer chains in the intermediate phase are constrained by crystallites with a broad size distribution, leading to one alpha(c)-relaxation peak with activation energy (Ea) of 53.39 kJ mol(-1). With an annealing temperature between 60 and 105 degrees C imperfect lamellae melting releases a part of the constraining force. Consequently, two alpha(c)-relaxation peaks can be observed (alpha(c1)-and alpha(c2)-relaxation in the order of increasing temperature). Both relaxation peaks shift to higher temperatures as annealing temperature increases. Ea of alpha(c1)-relaxation decreases from 38.43 to 35.55 kJ mol(-1) as the intermediate phase thickness increases from 2.0 to 2.2 nm. With an annealing temperature higher than 105 degrees C, a new crystalline phase is formed, which enhances the constraining force on the polymer chains. So the alpha(c1)-relaxation peak is broadened and its position shifts to a higher temperature. Moreover, the polymer chains between the initial and the newly formed crystalline phase are strongly confined. Therefore, the alpha(c2)-relaxation is undetectable. Ea of alpha(c1)-relaxation decreases from 23.58 to 13.68 kJ mol(-1) as the intermediate phase thickness increases from 2.3 to 3.0 nm.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?