Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

Disposing Principle and the Control of Police Authority

Restrictions and Separation of Power: Police Power in Criminal Justice

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Legal Control on Administrative Investigation

On Self-regulation of Administrative Discretion

The Political Control of Administrative Power:From the Perspective of American Administrative Law

Judicial Control of Administrative Discretionary Power

Legal Principles and Problems of the Concept of Restricted Discretion

The Indefinite Concept of Law Inferred from Administrative Tasks

Multi-Dimensional Interpretation Of "Discourse-Cognition-Society" In Administrative Law Enforcement

Guide,Manual and Discretion Standard in Modern Administrative Law

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

A Comparative Study of the Rule of Reasonableness and the Principle of Proportionality

Regulating judicial discretion on administrative penalty under clean government building

DISCRETIONARY POWER IN THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL SYSTEM OF URBAN PLANNING

Searching for a rational control direction to prevent corruption in the Korean police power - Focused on the UK police system -

The Criminal Policy under the Circumstance of the Contemporary Rule of Law

The Internal Logic of the Separation of Decision-Making,Enforcement and Oversight

The Formation and Progress of the Theory of Shrink of Administrative Discretion:From the Perspective of Administration to Prevent Dangers

An Exploration of the Juxtaposition of Professional and Political Accountability in Local Law Enforcement Management