Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

Regulating judicial discretion on administrative penalty under clean government building

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

On Self-regulation of Administrative Discretion

On the Judicial Factors Affecting the Environmental Administrative Penalty Enforcement:An Empirical Analysis

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

On Constraints and Route-Construction of Administrative Discretion Standard-Making

On Discretionary Mechanism of Penalty for Minor Offenders

Judicial Control of Administrative Discretionary Power

On Legal Guarantee Against the Supervisory Right of Network Public Opinions

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

Multi-agent game analysis on standardized discretion of environmental administrative penalty

On Criminal Penalty Restriction in Internet Public Opinion Supervising

Studies on Public Security Penalties: a Comparison Between Germany, Taiwan and Mainland China

Regulation by Soft Law of Administrative Discretion

Guide,Manual and Discretion Standard in Modern Administrative Law

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

A Study on the Administrative Penalty System: Penalty under Environmental Law

On the Litigability of Administrative Litigation for Punishment of Breach of Faith Chinese Full Text