Techno-Economic Comparison of Three Processes for Boiler Waste Heat Recovery
Youfu MA,Lijuan YANG,Junfu L(U)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7607.2017.04.011
2017-01-01
Abstract:Taking a 600 MW ultra-supercritical coal-fired power unit as an object of study,the thermal economy and techno-economic performance of following three processes for the boiler waste heat recovery were calculated and compared,such as the process of conventional low-temperature economizer,prepositive low-temperature economizer and that of bypass flue,etc.Results show that,in the case of waste heat recovery with exhaust flue gas temperature being reduced from 122 ℃ to 90 ℃,for above three processes,the net standard coal consumption rate of unit can be reduced by 1.51 g/(kW · h),1.71 g/(kW · h) and 2.81 g/(kW · h),respectively,with capital costs of 11.25,19.40 and 16.85 million CNY,and dynamic investment payoff periods of 4.42,8.66 and 3.29 years,accordingly.The prepositive low-temperature economizer process has the worst techno-economic performance,which has little improvement on net power supply efficiency,due to an obvious increase in equipment investment caused by the use of heat medium water air preheater.Among the three processes,the bypass flue one shows the highest thermal economy and best techno-economic performance,which is therefore recommended to be further studied for future application.