A Further Argumentation of the Literary Phase and Non-Literary Phase in Classical Drama--A Response to Ankui's Criticism

吕效平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7278.2004.04.019
2004-01-01
Abstract:This paper is a response to Anqui' s criticism of the author' s drama study as being too far away from the The author agrees that their difference does lie in the between their academic study and the practice. Ankui, on one hand, adhering plainly to the practice, fails to upgrade his study to the theoretical level and therefore lacks an academic spirit. On the other hand, he privileges propagating the national culture over seeking truth from the perspective of political pragmatism, thereby keeping insufficient distance from the subject of his study. This author argues once more that the classical Chinese drama, although originally similar to the European classical drama in terms of its literary nature, is always character-oriented rather than plot-oriented. This accounts for the reason why the classical Chinese drama has developed into a performance art.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?