Abstract:Background: Current hypertension guidelines recommend combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker with a calcium-channel blocker or thiazide diuretic as initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with monotherapy uncontrolled hypertension. However, to what extent these two different combinations are comparable in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety remains under investigation, especially in the Chinese population. We investigated the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of the amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies in Chinese patients. Methods: In a multi-center, randomized, actively controlled, parallel-group trial, we enrolled patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension from July 2018 to June 2021 in 20 hospitals and community health centers across China. Of the 894 screened patients, 560 eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine/benazepril 5/10 mg (n = 282) or benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide 10/12.5 mg (n = 278), with 213 and 212 patients, respectively, who completed the study and had a valid repeat ambulatory BP recording during follow-up and were included in the efficacy analysis. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 24 weeks of treatment in 24-h ambulatory systolic BP. Adverse events including symptoms and clinically significant changes in physical examinations and laboratory findings were recorded for safety analysis. Results: In the efficacy analysis (n = 425), the primary outcome, 24-h ambulatory systolic BP reduction, was - 13.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in the amlodipine/benazepril group and - 12.3 ± 1.2 mmHg in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group, with a between-group difference of - 1.51 (p = 0.36) mmHg. The between-group differences for major secondary outcomes were - 1.47 (p = 0.18) in 24-h diastolic BP, - 2.86 (p = 0.13) and - 2.74 (p = 0.03) in daytime systolic and diastolic BP, and - 0.45 (p = 0.82) and - 0.93 (p = 0.44) in nighttime systolic and diastolic BP. In the safety analysis (n = 560), the incidence rate of dry cough was significantly lower in the amlodipine/benazepril group than in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group (5.3% vs 10.1%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies were comparable in ambulatory systolic BP lowering. The former combination, compared with the latter, had a greater BP-lowering effect in the daytime and a lower incidence rate of dry cough. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03682692. Registered on 18 September 2018.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Domestic Produced Amlodipine Besylate in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Effects of Atenolol and Diltiazem-Sr on Quality of Life in the Hypertensive Patients

Multicenter Clinical Trial on Benidipine in the Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris

Clinical Study of Olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide Compound Tablet in Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertensive Patients Who Did Not Reach Goal with Olmesartan

Efficacy Comparison Between 5 Mg Perindopril Arginine Salt and 4 Mg Perindopril Tert-Butylamine Salt for Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

Evaluation of Efficacy of Atenolol and Diltiazem-Sr in the Treatment of Hypertension

Double-Blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered Nicorandil in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris in China

The Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine Maleate on Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

A Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of S-Amlodipine in China.

Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil-Amlodipine Besylate Tablet in Chinese Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-Center, Real-World Study

The Effectiveness and Safety of L-amlodipine Besylate for Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

G-002 AMLODIPINE/VALSARTAN 5/160 MG VERSUS VALSARTAN 160 MG IN PREDOMINANTLY CHINESE PATIENTS WITH STAGE 1 OR 2 ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED ON VALSARTAN 160 MG MONOTHERAPY

Levamlodipine Maleate Or Amlodipinebesylate For Treatment Of Hypertension: A Comparative Effectiveness Research

Comparison of two single-pill dual combination antihypertensive therapies in Chinese patients: a randomized, controlled trial

Efficacy and Safety of Domestic Olmesartan in Treatment of Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Amlodipine and Olmesartan or an Olmesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Compound for Hypertension: A Prospective, Open-Label, and Multicenter Clinical Trial in China.

A clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and safety of amlodipine besylate/atorvastatin calcium in treating hypertension complicated with hyperlipidemia

Double-blind Double-Dummy Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial of Domestic Cilnidipine on Treatment of Essential Hypertension

A18046 Levamlodipine Maleate or AmlodipineBesylate for Treatment of Hypertension

Comparison of Beijing Anti-hypertension 0 and Amlodiping in Treatment Essential Hypertension

Amlodipine/Valsartan 5/160 Mg Versus Valsartan 160 Mg In Chinese Hypertensives