Double-Blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered Nicorandil in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris in China

Wen-Ling Zhu,Yuan-Dong Shan,Jing-Xuan Guo,Jia-Ping Wei,Xin-Chun Yang,Tian-De Li,San-Qing Jia,Qing He,Jun-Zhu Chen,Zong-Gui Wu,Zhan-Quan Li,Kai You
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.71.826
2007-01-01
Circulation Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The efficacy and safety of nicorandil were evaluated in Chinese patients with stable angina pectoris (AP) in a double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial.METHODS AND RESULTS:After a 2-week washout period, 232 patients with stable AP were randomized to receive either nicorandil (5 mg tid; 115 patients) or isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN: 20 mg bid; 117 patients) for 2 weeks. Exercise capacity, number of weekly anginal attacks, nitroglycerin (NTG) consumption, and safety were evaluated. Nicorandil and ISMN significantly prolonged the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression in an exercise tolerance test. Both drugs improved the total exercise time and the time to onset of chest pain. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Nicorandil significantly decreased the number of anginal attacks and NTG consumption. ISMN decreased the number of anginal attacks significantly; however, there was no significance in NTG consumption, and the ratio of anginal attack reduction was at least 50% was significantly higher with nicorandil. Nicorandil was well tolerated and there was no safety profile difference compared with ISMN. Thus, nicorandil may have equivalent or better antianginal effect than ISMN.CONCLUSIONS:Nicorandil is beneficial as treatment for AP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?