Abstract:Background: Current hypertension guidelines recommend combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker with a calcium-channel blocker or thiazide diuretic as initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with monotherapy uncontrolled hypertension. However, to what extent these two different combinations are comparable in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety remains under investigation, especially in the Chinese population. We investigated the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of the amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies in Chinese patients. Methods: In a multi-center, randomized, actively controlled, parallel-group trial, we enrolled patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension from July 2018 to June 2021 in 20 hospitals and community health centers across China. Of the 894 screened patients, 560 eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine/benazepril 5/10 mg (n = 282) or benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide 10/12.5 mg (n = 278), with 213 and 212 patients, respectively, who completed the study and had a valid repeat ambulatory BP recording during follow-up and were included in the efficacy analysis. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 24 weeks of treatment in 24-h ambulatory systolic BP. Adverse events including symptoms and clinically significant changes in physical examinations and laboratory findings were recorded for safety analysis. Results: In the efficacy analysis (n = 425), the primary outcome, 24-h ambulatory systolic BP reduction, was - 13.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in the amlodipine/benazepril group and - 12.3 ± 1.2 mmHg in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group, with a between-group difference of - 1.51 (p = 0.36) mmHg. The between-group differences for major secondary outcomes were - 1.47 (p = 0.18) in 24-h diastolic BP, - 2.86 (p = 0.13) and - 2.74 (p = 0.03) in daytime systolic and diastolic BP, and - 0.45 (p = 0.82) and - 0.93 (p = 0.44) in nighttime systolic and diastolic BP. In the safety analysis (n = 560), the incidence rate of dry cough was significantly lower in the amlodipine/benazepril group than in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group (5.3% vs 10.1%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies were comparable in ambulatory systolic BP lowering. The former combination, compared with the latter, had a greater BP-lowering effect in the daytime and a lower incidence rate of dry cough. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03682692. Registered on 18 September 2018.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Amlodipine and Olmesartan or an Olmesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Compound for Hypertension: A Prospective, Open-Label, and Multicenter Clinical Trial in China.

Clinical Study of Olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide Compound Tablet in Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertensive Patients Who Did Not Reach Goal with Olmesartan

Efficacy and Safety of the Compound of Candesartan Cilexetial and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Essential Hypertension

Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil-Amlodipine Besylate Tablet in Chinese Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-Center, Real-World Study

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine fixed-dose combination for hypertensive patients uncontrolled with monotherapy

[A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Comparing a Fixed Dose Combination of Telmisartan 80 Mg Plus Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 Mg to Telmisartan 80 Mg in Chinese Hypertensive Patients Who Failed to Respond Adequately to Telmisartan 80 Mg].

Combination Of Amlodipine With Diuretics Or Telmisartan In High-Risk Hypertensive Patients: The Chinese Hypertension Intervention Efficacy Study (Chief)

Comparison of two single-pill dual combination antihypertensive therapies in Chinese patients: a randomized, controlled trial

G-002 AMLODIPINE/VALSARTAN 5/160 MG VERSUS VALSARTAN 160 MG IN PREDOMINANTLY CHINESE PATIENTS WITH STAGE 1 OR 2 ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED ON VALSARTAN 160 MG MONOTHERAPY

Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination in 11,422 Chinese Patients with Hypertension: an Observational Study

525 4 YEARS OUTCOME OF AMLODIPINE PLUS TELMISARTAN OR AMLODIPINE PLUS DIURETICS REGIMEN ON CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS 13542

Effects of Amlodipine Plus Telmisartan or Amlodipine Plus Amiroride Regimen on Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients:Preliminary Report of Chinese Hypertension Intervention Efficacy (Chief)trial

[Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan Potassium in Chinese Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension].

Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil‑amlodipine Besylate Tablets (sevikar®) in Older Patients with Essential Hypertension: Subgroup Analysis from the Sevikar Study.

Efficacy and safety of Qiangli Dingxuan tablet combined with amlodipine besylate for essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial

Amlodipine/Valsartan 5/160 Mg Versus Valsartan 160 Mg In Chinese Hypertensives

A randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single-pill combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg versus amlodipine 5 mg in hypertensive Asian patients.

China STudy of Valsartan/amlodipine Fixed-Dose Combination-Based Long-Term Blood Pressure Management in HypertenSive Patients: a One-Year Registry (china STATUS III)

Phase III randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of amlodipine and candesartan cilexetil combination for hypertension treatment

Therapeutic Efficacy of Valsartan and Valsartan/hctz in Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Patients

Long-Term Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Hypertensive Patients As Assessed by Clinic, Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Measurements