Analysis of the Clinical Therapeutic Effect of Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Open Surgery on Ureteral Calculus

徐晓健,侯建全,袁和兴,魏雪栋,张江磊,何雪峰

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2014.11.034

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical therapeutic effect of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and traditional ureterolithotomy on ureteral calculus,and evaluate the advantages of laparoscopic surgery. Methods: The clinical data of 45 patients who underwent traditional ureterolithotomy surgery(open surgery group) were retrospectively campared with those for 33 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery(laparoscopic group) in our hospital from September 2011 to February 2013. Results: All the surgeries were smoothly completed, two patients in laparoscopic group ended up in open surgery respectively because of calculus escape to the renal pelvic and chronic ureteritis. The bleeding volume, postoperative ambulation, anal exhaust time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative drainage time and hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was superior to that of open surgery group, nevertheless, the laparoscopic group had longer mean surgical time and higher cost of hospitalization, a statistically significant difference. No complications such as urinary fistula, poor wound healing and severe hematuria occurred in both groups. Conclusion: These two kinds of operation were both appropriate methods, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy had certain advantages in many aspects and traditional ureterolithotomy surgery had own characteristics.We surgeons should consider the willingness of patients, disease attributes, manipulation ability, the patients economic conditions and so on, to determine the final operation method.