Abstract:This paper completes and comments on some aspects of our previous publications. In ref [1], we have derived a set of space-time transformations referred to as the extended space-time transformations. These transformations, which assume the existence of a preferred aether frame and the variability of the one-way speed of light in the other frames, are compared to the Lorentz-Poincare transformations. We demonstrate that the extended transformations can be converted into a set of equations that have a similar mathematical form to the Lorentz-Poincare transformations, but which differ from them in that they connect reference frames whose co-ordinates are altered by the systematic unavoidable measurement distortions due to length contraction and clock retardation and by the usual synchronization procedures, a fact that the conventional approaches of relativity do not show. As a result, we confirm that the relativity principle is not a fundamental principle of physics [i.e, it does not rigorously apply in the physical world when the true co-ordinates are used]. It is contingent but seems to apply provided that the distorted coordinates are used. The apparent invariance of the speed of light also results from the measurement distortions. The space-time transformations relating experimental data, therefore, conceal hidden variables which deserved to be disclosed for a deeper understanding of physics.

Leach Et Al. Reply:

ON THE LOW SPEED LIMITS OF LORENTZ'S TRANSFORMATION - HOW RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS RETAIN OR VANISH IN ELECTROMAGNETISM

On The Low Speed Limits of Lorentz's Transformation

Qin Et Al. Reply

Barbalinardo et al. Reply.

Choi et al. Reply

Aether Theory and the Principle of Relativity

An Et Al. Reply.

Yang Et Al. Reply.

Sinha and Amaratunga Reply:

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Hess et al. Reply:

Yim, Pang, and Thornton Reply:

On the electrodynamics of moving bodies at low velocities

Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Gao et al. Reply

Liuet al.Reply:

Li and Ma Reply:

Zu et al. reply:.

Zhou et al. Reply:

Erratum: Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac and Landau-Lifshitz equations of motion and the solution to a relativistic electron in a counterpropagating laser beam ]