Abstract:From the viewpoint of scientific communication theory and academic relations between authors, measuring academic influence of researchers should seek a integrated citation collaboration pattern. However, current studies have two shortcomings, firstly, research evaluation metrics at the individual level such as citations and hindex does not take into account the number of coauthors and the contribution of each author in the byline; secondly, several studies have shown the applicability of centrality measures for coauthorship networks to indicate how centrality measures are useful to re?ect the scholars performance based on their position and in?uence within their collaboration network. But most of them do not consider collaborations frequency and therefore they are not useful for weighted network analysis. This article introduced author order and coauthor frequency of publications into the citation and collaboration measures respectively, proposed two pairs of metrics "harmonic hindex plus harmonic Rindex" and "hdegree plus Rdegree" to measure the more realistic and objective citation influence and collaboration influence. Using a sample of 40 Ph.D. mentors in the field of cardiac and cardiovascular diseases, Spearmans correlation analysis shows significant positive correlation among the indicators measuring traditional citation impact, harmonic citation impact and collaboration impact. The hdegree and Rdegree may reflect collaboration influence that is distinctive from the citation impact. Scientometric and informatric researchers can retrieve and discern the high influential scholars from the aspects of both citation and collaboration, which is helpful for decision making in talents recruitment and research evaluation at the individual level.

Finding High-Impact Interdisciplinary Users Based on Friend Discipline Distribution in Academic Social Networking Sites

Exploring Academics' Beliefs about Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration and Their Influences on Collaborative Practices: a Mixed-Method Study in China

Exploring Interdisciplinarity of Science Projects Based on the Text Mining

Network Based Approach for Discovering Academic Researchers with Shared Interests

Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A

Analysis of Scientific Research Cooperation Trends and Research Dimension of Interna-tional Academic Social Networks

Disciplinary Comparisons of Academic Social Networking Site Use by Chinese Researchers

An Effective Method of Discovering Target Groups on Social Networking Sites.

The Dynamics of Q&A in Academic Social Networking Sites: Insights from Participants, Interaction Network, Response Time, and Discipline Differences

How does scholarly use of academic social networking sites differ by academic discipline? A case study using ResearchGate

A Community Detection Approach for Academic Social Network: the Case of the Cross-Strait Academic Conference Network

Detecting Hotspots in Interdisciplinary Research Based on Overlapping Community Detection

How Do You Interact With Your Old Friends On A New Site: Understanding Social Ties Among Different Social Network Sites

Profiling and predicting the problem-solving patterns in China's research systems: A methodology of intelligent bibliometrics and empirical insights

Discovering target groups in social networking sites: An effective method for maximizing joint influential power

Characterizing Interdisciplinarity of Researchers and Research Topics Using Web Search Engines

Dynamic Network Analytics for Recommending Scientific Collaborators

User Behaviors and Network Characteristics of US Research Universities on an Academic Social Networking Site

Social Network Extraction of Academic Researchers

Twodimensional Measurement for Academic Influence of Researchers:Integration of Citation Impact and Collaboration Impact

Finding Structural Hole Spanners Based on Community Forest Model and Diminishing Marginal Utility in Large Scale Social Networks.