Abstract:Academic social networking sites are important communication tools commonly used by scholars. In order to obtain an understanding of how scholars at US higher education institutions utilize these sites, this study took ResearchGate (RG) as an example and collected data from 168,059 users from 61 US higher education institutions at three research activity levels as defined by the Carnegie Classification. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted, and four clusters of institutions with different behavior patterns were observed. The results indicate that US higher education institutions play different roles based on their academic influence in the network and demonstrate distinct behaviors in overall participation, information seeking, and information sharing. Users from universities of higher academic influence exhibited a preponderance for presentation behavior and were popular in the network, while scholars at moderate research-level institutions were active in seeking behavior as well as self-improvement. However, those at lower levels were comparatively inactive. The hierarchical clustering result also suggests that user behavior on this academic social networking site reflects the academic research activity level and level of academic influence accurately and effectively. These findings show a positive correlation between levels of scholarly output and utilization of academic social networking sites. This study also contributes to the ongoing efforts in understanding the scholarly use of academic social networking sites, and to the debate on whether associated alternative metrics (altmetrics) serve as supplementary evaluation measures of scholarship in higher education. The practical implications of the study are also discussed.

Disciplinary Comparisons of Academic Social Networking Site Use by Chinese Researchers

Participation, Academic Influences and Interactions: A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Research Universities on ResearchGate

Visualizing ResearchGate As a Scholarly Social Networking Site for U.S. Research Universities.

How does scholarly use of academic social networking sites differ by academic discipline? A case study using ResearchGate

User Behaviors and Network Characteristics of US Research Universities on an Academic Social Networking Site

Empirical Analysis of Scholar Communication Behavior Based on ResearchGate--Case Study of Beijing Normal University

Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A

Use of Social Media for Academic Purposes in China

Comparing Topics of Scholars' Blog Posts in an Academic Social Networking Site and Publication Keywords.

Comparing Community-based Information Adoption and Diffusion Across Different Microblogging Sites

Finding High-Impact Interdisciplinary Users Based on Friend Discipline Distribution in Academic Social Networking Sites

The Research on the Use of Chinese Social - Science Information Resources on the Internet:The Comparison Between the Use of Users in and out of University

Comparison of Research on Social Media in China and Foreign Countries Based on Bibliometric Analysis

College Students on Weibo: Do They Behavior Differently?

Comparison of Linguistic Characteristics of Different Disciplines' Questions on Academic Social Q&A Sites

Cross-platform comparison of framed topics in Twitter and Weibo: machine learning approaches to social media text mining

Chinese Researchers, Scholarly Communication Behaviour and Trust

Academic Social Networking: from Individual Acts to Institutional, Disciplinary, National, and Social Phenomena

Studying on the Using Patterns of Chinese SNS Platforms

Analyzing the follower---followee ratio to determine user characteristics and institutional participation differences among research universities on ResearchGate

Analysis And Comparison Of Interaction Patterns In Online Social Network And Social Media