Comparison of Planning Between 3D-Printing Non-Coplanar Template and 3D-Printing Coplanar Template-Assisted Radioactive Seed Implantation As Re-Irradiation for Pelvic Wall Recurrent Gynecological Malignant Tumors

A. Qu,J. Wang,H. Sun,P. Jiang,Y. Jiang,Z. Ji,J. Fan,W. Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.875
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the difference of preoperative planning parameters between 3D-printing non-coplanar template (3D-PNCT) and 3D-printing coplanar template (3D-PCT) in the treatment of pelvic wall recurrent gynecological malignant tumor with radioactive seeds implantation, and to guide the clinical application. Methods: From January 2016 to March 2018, 33 patients with pelvic wall recurrent gynecological malignant tumor were treated with radioactive seeds implantation assisted by 3D-printing template and in Peking University Third Hospital. All patients underwent 3D-PNCT and 3D-PCT preoperative planning. The D(90) of target remained similar for the same patient. The parameters were compared with Wilcoxon test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: D(90) was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of inserting needles through intestine and bone in 3D-PNCT group was less than that in 3D-PCT group (0 (0-13), 0 (0-25), Z=-2.941, P<0.05;0 (0-3), 0 (0-25), Z=-2.232, P<0.05). Conclusion: For patients with gynecological malignancies with pelvic recurrence, both of the two peroperative plans could achieve prescription dose, but 3D-PNCT is more safer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?