Abstract:It is well known that big fish eat small fish, but how does it change that relationship in 3D environments (the sea) versus 2D (bottom of the sea) environments is not clear. The role of dimensionality of predator search space and feeding strategies (crabs vs. snails) are critical. Disentangling the determinants of trophic structure is central to ecology. The capacity to capture subjugate and consume a prey (i.e. gape limitation) is a relevant limitation to acquire energy for most organisms, especially those in smaller size ranges. This generates a size hierarchy of trophic positions in which large organisms consume small ones. Body size is tightly correlated to gape limitation and explains a large fraction of variance in the body size‐trophic position relationship. However, a considerable fraction of variance still remains to be explained. Consumer search space dimensionality (2D or 3D) and feeding strategies, temperature and the size structure of primary producers can alter the trophic structure, but tests based on information from natural food webs are scarce. We generated specific predictions about the body size trophic position relationship and evaluated them using information from a subtropical South Atlantic coastal marine ecosystem: benthic realm (2D, rocky shore and sandy beach) and the pelagic realm (3D). We characterized this marine coastal food web based on stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen from 256 samples from primary producers (macroalgae and phytoplankton) to large predators (sand shark) in summer and winter. Consumer body size encompassed six orders of magnitude in weight from 10−2 to 6 × 104 g. Isotopic signal corresponded to an integration of carbon sources from basal consumers to top predators. The body size‐trophic position relationship showed a linear positive association with different slopes for the benthic and pelagic environments. This implies a smaller predator prey size ratio for pelagic (3D) with respect to benthic consumers (2D) as theoretically expected. No seasonal differences were found in slopes and most of the overall variance in benthic environments was largely explained by feeding strategies of the different taxonomic groups. We provide an integrated evaluation on the role of body size, consumer search space and feeding strategy to understand the determinants of trophic position. Results demonstrate that integrating gape limitation hypothesis, the dimensionality of consumer search space and feeding strategies into a formal robust framework to understand trophic structure is feasible even in complex natural ecosystems. Resumen Identificar los determinantes de la estructura trófica es central en ecología. El presente trabajo brinda evidencia empírica sobre el rol del tamaño corporal, la dimensión del espacio de búsqueda de los depredadores y la estrategia de alimentación como determinantes de la posición trófica y su relación con el tamaño. La capacidad de capturar y consumir presas limitado por la apertura de boca es una restricción para la obtención de energía, especialmente en aquellos de pequeño tamaño. Este mecanismo genera una jerarquía de tamaños en la posición trófica de los organismos, donde los grandes consumen a los más pequeños, explicando así gran parte de la variación en la relación tamaño corporal‐posición trófica. Sin embargo, la dimensión espacial en la búsqueda de presas (2D, 3D), la temperatura, las estrategias alimentarias y la productividad primaria del sistema pueden modificar la relación esperada. Esto ha sido escasamente explorado in situ en tramas tróficas naturales. El presente trabajo estableció predicciones específicas en la relación tamaño corporal posición trófica y lo evaluó en diferentes módulos de un ecosistema subtropical marino‐costero de Sudamérica: el ambiente bentónico (2D, costa rocosa y playa arenosa) y pelágico (3D). La estructura trófica se caracterizó mediante isótopos estables de carbono y nitrógeno en 256 organismos, desde productores primarios (macroalgas y fitoplancton) hasta grandes depredadores (tiburón sarda) en verano e invierno. El rango de tamaños corporales abarcó 6 órdenes de magnitud en peso, desde 10−2 a 6 × 104 g. La señal isotópica indicó una integración de fuentes de carbono desde los consumidores primarios hasta los depredadores superiores. Se observó una relación lineal positiva entre el tamaño corporal y la posición trófica, con una pendiente menor para el ambiente pelágico (3D) con respecto al bentónico (2D), coincidente con las predicciones teóricas. No se observaron diferencias estacionales. La relación tamaño corporal y la posición trófica del ambiente bentónico presentó una gran variabilidad, con restricciones diferenciales entre grupos taxonómicos según sus hábitos alimentarios. Esta evaluación basada en el tamaño corporal, el espacio de búsqueda y la estrategia de alimentación permiten comprender los determinantes de la posici -Abstract Truncated-

A new index to estimate ecological generalisation in consumer‐resource interactions

A new tool to improve the estimates of interaction rewiring considering the whole community composition

The Jensen effect and functional single index models: Estimating the ecological implications of nonlinear reaction norms

Resource partitioning in a novel herbivore assemblage in South America

Eliciting diverse perspectives to prioritize community actions for biodiversity conservation

When indices disagree: facing conceptual and practical challenges

A statistical approach to assess interspecific consumptive competition and functional redundancy in ephemeral resource uses using camera traps

Detecting the Effects of Fishing on Seabed Community Diversity: Importance of Scale and Sample Size

Predicting effects of multiple interacting global change drivers across trophic levels

The relative importance of local versus regional habitat structure variation on the abundance of two generalist mutualists along a forest disturbance gradient

Is it all about size? Dismantling the integrated phenotype to understand species coexistence and niche segregation

Community connectivity and local heterogeneity explain animal species co‐occurrences within pond communities

Spatial fingerprint of consumer body size and habitat preference on resource distribution

Niche‐based approach to explore the impacts of environmental disturbances on biodiversity

Statistical analysis of species association indices

Numerical responses in resource-based mutualisms: A time scale approach

Method of predicting reference condition biota affects the performance and interpretation of ecological indices

Spatial analysis of demand for sparsely located ecosystem services using alternative index approaches

Parameter redundancy in Type III functional response models with consumer interference

Out-of-equlibrium inference of stochastic model parameters through population data from generic consumer-resource dynamics

Habitat dimensionality and feeding strategies but not temperature as determinants of body size‐trophic structure relationship in a marine food web