Abstract:Biodiversity, a multidimensional property of natural systems, is difficult to quantify partly because of the multitude of indices proposed for this purpose. Indices aim to describe general properties of communities that allow us to compare different regions, taxa, and trophic levels. Therefore, they are of fundamental importance for environmental monitoring and conservation, although there is no consensus about which indices are more appropriate and informative. We tested several common diversity indices in a range of simple to complex statistical analyses in order to determine whether some were better suited for certain analyses than others. We used data collected around the focal plant Plantago lanceolata on 60 temperate grassland plots embedded in an agricultural landscape to explore relationships between the common diversity indices of species richness (S), Shannon's diversity (H'), Simpson's diversity (D1), Simpson's dominance (D2), Simpson's evenness (E), and Berger-Parker dominance (BP). We calculated each of these indices for herbaceous plants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, aboveground arthropods, belowground insect larvae, and P. lanceolata molecular and chemical diversity. Including these trait-based measures of diversity allowed us to test whether or not they behaved similarly to the better studied species diversity. We used path analysis to determine whether compound indices detected more relationships between diversities of different organisms and traits than more basic indices. In the path models, more paths were significant when using H', even though all models except that with E were equally reliable. This demonstrates that while common diversity indices may appear interchangeable in simple analyses, when considering complex interactions, the choice of index can profoundly alter the interpretation of results. Data mining in order to identify the index producing the most significant results should be avoided, but simultaneously considering analyses using multiple indices can provide greater insight into the interactions in a system.

When indices disagree: facing conceptual and practical challenges

Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories

Understanding 'it depends' in ecology: a guide to hypothesising, visualising and interpreting statistical interactions

Measuring metrics: what diversity indicators are most appropriate for different forms of data bias?

A practical guide to selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology

A totally empirical basis of science

Dispelling five myths about hypothesis testing in biological systematics

Statistical analysis of species association indices

The Jensen effect and functional single index models: Estimating the ecological implications of nonlinear reaction norms

A model of multiple hypothesis testing

The improbability of detecting trade-offs and some practical solutions

A Novel Method for Nonparametric Statistical Inference for Niche Overlap in Multiple Species

Post-clustering difference testing: Valid inference and practical considerations with applications to ecological and biological data

A Habitat Selection Multiverse Reveals Largely Consistent Results Despite a Multitude of Analysis Options

Quantifying convergence and consistency

The multinomial index: a robust measure of reproductive skew

Methods for testing publication bias in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses

Composite indices, alternative weights, and comparison robustness

Persisting challenges in multiple models: a note on commonly unnoticed issues regarding collinearity and spatial structure of ecological data

Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects

From significance testing to estimation and Open Science: How esci can help