Abstract:We use a two‐patch deterministic consumer‐resource model to study how local habitat loss propagates to another location, and to the landscape scale, in presence and absence of eco‐evolutionary dynamics. We show that local resource loss can drive consumers extinct at the landscape level, although this can be prevented by evolutionary rescue in some cases when the consumer death rate is sufficiently small. Habitat loss (HL) is a major cause of species extinctions. Although the effects of HL beyond the directly impacted area have been previously observed, they have not been modelled explicitly, especially in an eco‐evolutionary context. To start filling this gap, we study a two‐patch deterministic consumer‐resource model, with one of the patches experiencing loss of resources as a special case of HL. Our model allows foraging and mating within a patch as well as between patches. We then introduce heritable variation in consumer traits related to resource utilization and patch use to investigate eco‐evolutionary dynamics and compare results with constant and no trait variation scenarios. Our results show that HL in one patch can indeed reduce consumer densities in the neighbouring patch but can also increase consumer densities in the neighbouring patch when the resources are overexploited. Yet at the landscape scale, the effect of HL on consumer densities is consistently negative. Patch isolation increases consumer density in the patch experiencing HL but has generally negative effects on the neighbouring patch, with context‐dependent results at the landscape scale. With high cross‐patch dependence and coupled foraging and mating preferences, local HL can sometimes even lead to landscape‐level consumer extinction. Eco‐evolutionary dynamics can rescue consumers from such extinction in some cases if their death rates are sufficiently small. More generally, trait evolution had positive or negative effects on equilibrium consumer densities after HL, depending on the evolving trait and the spatial scale considered. In summary, our findings show that HL at a local scale can affect the neighbouring patch and the landscape as a whole, where heritable trait variation can, in some cases, alleviate the impact of HL. We thus suggest joint consideration of multiple spatial scales and trait variation when assessing and predicting the impacts of HL.

Spatial fingerprint of consumer body size and habitat preference on resource distribution

Resource Depletion and Habitat Segregation by Competitors Under Predation Hazard

Joint Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Species' Life-History Traits on Population Dynamics in Spatially Structured Landscapes.

Movement bias in asymmetric landscapes and its impact on population distribution and critical habitat size

Geographic gradients in a functional trait: Drivers of body size and size diversity of ground invertebrate communities

Quantifying Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Other Clustering Processes on Spatial Distributions of Tree Species

Carnivore space use behaviors reveal variation in responses to human land modification

A publication of the ecological society of america

Scaling of the risk landscape drives optimal life history strategies and the evolution of grazing

Body size modulates the extent of seasonal diet switching by large mammalian herbivores in Yellowstone National Park

How resource abundance and stochasticity affect organisms' range sizes

Spatial Pattern of Habitat Quality Modulates Population Persistence in Fragmented Landscapes

Within-Patch Habitat Quality Determines the Resilience of Specialist Species in Fragmented Landscapes

Multi‐scale effects of habitat loss and the role of trait evolution

Bioenergetic trophic trade-offs determine mass-dependent extinction thresholds across the Cenozoic

Body size and trophic structure explain global asymmetric response of tetrapod diversity to climate effects

Effect of species-level trait variation on urban exploitation in mammals

Effects of Heterogeneity and Spatial Pattern in Multi-Patch Consumer-Resource Systems with Asymmetric Diffusion

Variation in body size drives spatial and temporal variation in lobster-urchin interaction strength

Ontogeny shapes individual specialization

Size change, shape change, and the growth space of a community