Abstract:It is well known that big fish eat small fish, but how does it change that relationship in 3D environments (the sea) versus 2D (bottom of the sea) environments is not clear. The role of dimensionality of predator search space and feeding strategies (crabs vs. snails) are critical. Disentangling the determinants of trophic structure is central to ecology. The capacity to capture subjugate and consume a prey (i.e. gape limitation) is a relevant limitation to acquire energy for most organisms, especially those in smaller size ranges. This generates a size hierarchy of trophic positions in which large organisms consume small ones. Body size is tightly correlated to gape limitation and explains a large fraction of variance in the body size‐trophic position relationship. However, a considerable fraction of variance still remains to be explained. Consumer search space dimensionality (2D or 3D) and feeding strategies, temperature and the size structure of primary producers can alter the trophic structure, but tests based on information from natural food webs are scarce. We generated specific predictions about the body size trophic position relationship and evaluated them using information from a subtropical South Atlantic coastal marine ecosystem: benthic realm (2D, rocky shore and sandy beach) and the pelagic realm (3D). We characterized this marine coastal food web based on stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen from 256 samples from primary producers (macroalgae and phytoplankton) to large predators (sand shark) in summer and winter. Consumer body size encompassed six orders of magnitude in weight from 10−2 to 6 × 104 g. Isotopic signal corresponded to an integration of carbon sources from basal consumers to top predators. The body size‐trophic position relationship showed a linear positive association with different slopes for the benthic and pelagic environments. This implies a smaller predator prey size ratio for pelagic (3D) with respect to benthic consumers (2D) as theoretically expected. No seasonal differences were found in slopes and most of the overall variance in benthic environments was largely explained by feeding strategies of the different taxonomic groups. We provide an integrated evaluation on the role of body size, consumer search space and feeding strategy to understand the determinants of trophic position. Results demonstrate that integrating gape limitation hypothesis, the dimensionality of consumer search space and feeding strategies into a formal robust framework to understand trophic structure is feasible even in complex natural ecosystems. Resumen Identificar los determinantes de la estructura trófica es central en ecología. El presente trabajo brinda evidencia empírica sobre el rol del tamaño corporal, la dimensión del espacio de búsqueda de los depredadores y la estrategia de alimentación como determinantes de la posición trófica y su relación con el tamaño. La capacidad de capturar y consumir presas limitado por la apertura de boca es una restricción para la obtención de energía, especialmente en aquellos de pequeño tamaño. Este mecanismo genera una jerarquía de tamaños en la posición trófica de los organismos, donde los grandes consumen a los más pequeños, explicando así gran parte de la variación en la relación tamaño corporal‐posición trófica. Sin embargo, la dimensión espacial en la búsqueda de presas (2D, 3D), la temperatura, las estrategias alimentarias y la productividad primaria del sistema pueden modificar la relación esperada. Esto ha sido escasamente explorado in situ en tramas tróficas naturales. El presente trabajo estableció predicciones específicas en la relación tamaño corporal posición trófica y lo evaluó en diferentes módulos de un ecosistema subtropical marino‐costero de Sudamérica: el ambiente bentónico (2D, costa rocosa y playa arenosa) y pelágico (3D). La estructura trófica se caracterizó mediante isótopos estables de carbono y nitrógeno en 256 organismos, desde productores primarios (macroalgas y fitoplancton) hasta grandes depredadores (tiburón sarda) en verano e invierno. El rango de tamaños corporales abarcó 6 órdenes de magnitud en peso, desde 10−2 a 6 × 104 g. La señal isotópica indicó una integración de fuentes de carbono desde los consumidores primarios hasta los depredadores superiores. Se observó una relación lineal positiva entre el tamaño corporal y la posición trófica, con una pendiente menor para el ambiente pelágico (3D) con respecto al bentónico (2D), coincidente con las predicciones teóricas. No se observaron diferencias estacionales. La relación tamaño corporal y la posición trófica del ambiente bentónico presentó una gran variabilidad, con restricciones diferenciales entre grupos taxonómicos según sus hábitos alimentarios. Esta evaluación basada en el tamaño corporal, el espacio de búsqueda y la estrategia de alimentación permiten comprender los determinantes de la posici -Abstract Truncated-

A publication of the ecological society of america

Body Size As Key Trait Determining Aquatic Metacommunity Assemblies in Benthonic and Planktonic Habitats of Dongting Lake, China

How dispersal limitation shapes species-body size distributions in local communities

Variation in body size drives spatial and temporal variation in lobster-urchin interaction strength

Size‐dependence of food intake and mortality interact with temperature and seasonality to drive diversity in fish life histories

Scaling body size fluctuations

Testing Multiple Assembly Rule Models in Avian Communities on Islands of an Inundated Lake, Zhejiang Province, China

Organism body size structures the soil microbial and nematode community assembly at a continental and global scale

A Global Analysis of Cladoceran Body Size and Its Variation Linking to Habitat, Distribution and Taxonomy

Community structure and collapses in multichannel food webs: Role of consumer body sizes and mesohabitat productivities

How selection structures species abundance distributions

Limited effects of management and ecological subsidies on the size-spectra of kelp forest fish communities

Geographic gradients in a functional trait: Drivers of body size and size diversity of ground invertebrate communities

Improving the biological realism of predator-prey size relationships in food web models alters ecosystem dynamics

Coordination and divergence in community assembly processes across co-occurring microbial groups separated by cell size

Interplay of spatial dynamics and local adaptation shapes species lifetime distributions and species-area relationships

Investigating the Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Body Size Disparity in Communities of Non‐Volant Terrestrial Mammals

Fish body size influenced by multiple drivers

Bioenergetic trophic trade-offs determine mass-dependent extinction thresholds across the Cenozoic

Chapter Six - Population and Community Body Size Structure Across a Complex Environmental Gradient

Habitat dimensionality and feeding strategies but not temperature as determinants of body size‐trophic structure relationship in a marine food web