Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Value of Real-Time Ultrasonic Elastography in Identification of Breast Masses

Evaluation Stiff Rim Sign in Breast Lesions by Shear Wave Elastography with Quantative Values

Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in breast neoplasm

Value of Different Parameters of Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Application Value of Elastosonography Ratio Method and Area Ratio Method in the Identification of Benign and Malig-nant Breast Lumps

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Comparison of Ultrasonic Elastic Strain Rate and Elastic Imaging Scoring Method in Application of Qualitative Diagnosis for Breast Masses

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

The value of elastography strain rate ratio in benign and malignant BI-RADS-US 3-4 breast masses

Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method

The value of ultrasound elastography combined with multi-parameters in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

A Comparative Study of Three Ultrasonic Elastographic Methods for the Differentiation and Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

The Assessment of Coner bute Value of Breast Disease with Ultrasound Elastography Imaging for the BI-RADS-US Categories

Value of Combined Application of Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasonography in the Differen tial Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

The Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant in Mass Type Breast Diseases Based on the Real-Time Monitoring of Full-Angle Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elastography

The value of medical image processing in elastography of breast

Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Semiquantitative Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules by Ultrasound

Clinical use and adjustment of ultrasound elastography for breast lesions followed WFUMB guidelines and recommendations in the real world